INCEPTION MINING: Securities And Exchange Commission

The following excerpt is from the company's SEC filing.

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

Amendment No. 1

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 333-147056

INCEPTION MINING, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Nevada

35-2302128

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer

Incorporation or Organization)

Identification Number)< br>
5330 South 900 East, Suite 280

Murray, UT

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

(801) 312-8113

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class registered:

Name of each exchange on which registered:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.00001 par value.

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [  ]

Accelerated filer [  ]

Non-accelerated filer [  ]

Smaller reporting company [X]

(Do not check if a smaller

reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [  ] Yes [X] No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $35,225,594.

The number of shares of registrant’s common stock outstanding as of April 21, 2016 was 264,750,145.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise indicated, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company” refer to Inception Mining, Inc., a Nevada corporation.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (“Form 10-K/A”) is being filed as Amendment No. 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2016 (the “Original Filing”).

This Form 10-K/A is being filed to:

Restate the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 to reflect revised valuations of derivative liabilities and debt discounts on convertible notes;

Restate results disclosed for the above noted changes to the consolidated financial statements;

Amend the cover page to correctly state the registration of the Company’s common stock

The restatements are being made in accordance with ASC 250, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” The disclosure provision of ASC 250 requires a company that corrects an error to disclose that its previously issued financial statements have been restated, a description of the nature of the error, the effect of the correction on each financial statement line item and any per share amount affected for each prior period presented, and the cumulative effect on retained earnings (deficit) in the statement of financial position as of the beginning of the each period presented.

The effects of the adjustments on the Company’s previously issued 2015 consolidated financial statement are summarized as follows:

Consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015:

Originally Reported

Restatement Adjustment

As Restated

Convertible notes payable

117,235

(2,682

114,553

Convertible notes payable - related parties

1,885,958

(39,813

1,846,145

Derivative liaibility

9,966,095

16,968,261

26,934,356

Total current liabilities

17,960,609

16,925,766

34,886,375

Total liabilities

18,039,980

34,965,746

Accumulated deficit

(13,427,504

(16,925,766

(30,353,270

Total controlling interest

(15,106,611

(32,032,377

Total stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

(15,114,761

(32,040,527

Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the year ended December 31, 2015:

As Restated

Change in derivative liability

(2,944,510

5,800,430

2,855,920

Interest expense

(5,395,737

(22,726,196

(28,121,933

Total other income (expense)

(8,477,700

(25,403,466

Loss from operations before income taxes

(10,239,578

(27,165,344

Net loss

Net loss - controlling interest

(10,236,284

(27,162,050

Net loss per share - basic and diluted

Total comprehensive loss

(10,432,249

(27,358,015

Total comprehensive loss - controlling interest

(10,428,766

(27,354,532

The adjustments above reflect restatement due to revised valuations of derivative liabilities on convertible notes payable and the associated debt discounts being recognized during the year, together with the change in the derivative liability and the amortization of the debt discounts during the year. The adjustments to the derivative liabilities were caused by an error in the VWAP calculation used to determine the valuation of the derivative liabilities.

For the convenience of the reader, this Form 10-K/A sets forth the Original Filing in its entirety. However, this Form 10-K/A only amends and restates the Items described above, and we have not modified or updated other disclosures presented in our Original Filing, with the exception of a few typographical errors in the original file. Accordingly, this Amendment No. 1 does not reflect events occurring after the filing of our Original Filing and does not modify or update those disclosures affected by subsequent events, except as specifically referenced herein. Information not affected by this restatement is unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the Original Filing on May 3, 2016.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOSSARY OF MINING TERMS

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (RESTATE

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

ITEM 9A(T).

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS

SIGNATURES

GLOSSARY OF MINING TERMS

An “exploration stage” prospect is one which is not in either the development or production stage.

development stage

A “development stage” project is one which is undergoing preparation of an established commercially mineable deposit for its extraction but which is not yet in production. This stage occurs after completion of a feasibility study.

mineralized

The term “mineralized material” refers to material that is not included in the reserve as it does not meet all of the criteria for adequate demonstration for economic or legal extraction.

probable reserve

The term “probable reserve” refers to reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.

production stage

A “production stage” project is actively engaged in the process of extraction and beneficiation of mineral reserves to produce a marketable metal or mineral product.

proven reserve

The term “proven reserve” refers to reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established.

The term “reserve” refers to that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. Reserves must be supported by a feasibility study done to bankable standards that demonstrates the economic extraction. (“Bankable standards” implies that the confidence attached to the costs and achievements developed in the study is sufficient for the project to be eligible for external debt financing.) A reserve includes adjustments to the in-situ tons and grade to include diluting materials and allowances for losses that might occur when the material is mined.

Additional definitions for terms currently or previously used in the Company’s Annual Reports filed on Form 10-K:

Assay

– a measure of the valuable mineral content.

Block model

– The representation of geologic units using three-dimensional blocks of pre-determined sizes.

Cut-off grade

– When determining economically viable mineral reserves, the lowest grade of mineralized material that qualifies as ore, i.e. that can be mined at a profit.

Diamond drill

– A type of rotary drill in which the cutting is done by abrasion rather than by percussion. The drill cuts a core of rock which is recovered in long cylindrical sections.

Fault

- A fracture in the earth’s crust caused by tectonic forces with displacement along the fracture.

Feasibility study

– A study or group of studies that determine the economic viability of a given mineral occurrence.

g/t or gpt

– Grams per metric ton.

Grade

– A term used to assign metal value to resources and reserves, such as gram per ton (g/t) or troy ounces per ton (oz/ton).

Gravity

– A methodology using instrumentation allowing the accurate measuring of the difference between densities of various geological units in situ.

Heap leaching

– A process which uses dilute sodium-cyanide solutions to percolate through run-of-mine or crushed ore heaped on lined pad to dissolve gold and/or silver.

in-situ

– in its natural position

Mineral

– A naturally formed chemical element or compound having a definite chemical composition and, usually, a characteristic crystal form.

Mineralization

– A natural occurrence in rocks or soil of one or more metal yielding minerals.

Mineral deposit

– A mineralized body, which has been intersected by a sufficient number of drill holes or by underground workings to give an estimate of grade(s) of metal(s) and thus to warrant further exploration or development. A mineral deposit does not qualify as a commercially viable mineral deposit with reserves under standards set by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission until a final, comprehensive, economic, technical and legal feasibility study has been completed.

Mining

– The process of extraction and beneficiation of mineral reserves to produce a marketable metal or mineral product. Exploration continues during the mining process and, in many cases, mineral reserves are expanded during the life of the mine operations as the exploration potential of the deposit is realized.

– A net smelter returns royalty, which is customarily calculated by subtracting from gross revenues a deduction for calculated mill recoveries, transport costs of any concentrates to a smelter, treatment and refining charges, and other deductions at the smelter and multiplying that result by the prescribed rate.

Open pit

– Surface mining in which the ore is extracted from a pit or quarry, the geometry of the pit may vary with the characteristics of the ore body.

- A natural aggregate of one or more minerals which, at a specified time and place, may be mined and processed and the product(s) sold at a profit or from which some part may be profitably separated.

Ore body

– a mostly solid and fairly continuous mass of mineralization estimated to be economically mineable.

Ore grade

– the average weight of the valuable metal or mineral contained in a specific weight of ore i.e. grams per ton of ore

Oxide

– gold bearing ore which results from the oxidation of near surface sulfide ore

Quartz

– a mineral composed of silicon dioxide, SiO2 (silica).

Reclamation

– The process by which lands disturbed as a result of mining activity are modified to support beneficial land use. Reclamation activity may include the removal of buildings, equipment, machinery and other physical remnants of mining, closure of tailings storage facilities, leach pads and other mine features, and contouring, covering and re-vegetation of waste rock and other disturbed areas.

– indurated naturally occurring mineral matter of various compositions.

Sampling and analytical variance/precision

– an estimate of the total error induced by sampling, sample preparation and analysis.

SEC Industry Guide 7

– U.S. reporting guidelines that apply to registrants engaged or to be engaged in significant mining operations.

Sediment

– particles transported by water, wind, gravity or ice.

Sedimentary rock

– rock formed at the earth’s surface from solid particles, whether mineral or organic, which have been moved from their position of origin and re-deposited

Strike

– the direction or trend that a structural surface, e.g. a bedding or fault plane, takes as it intersects the horizontal

Strip

– to remove barren rock or overburden in order to expose ore

– a thin, sheet like crosscutting body of hydrothermal mineralization, principally quartz.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise indicated, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company” refer to Inception Mining, Inc., a Nevada corporation.

Forward-Looking Statements and Associated Risks. This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among other things, (1) discussions about mineral resources and mineralized material, (2) our projected sales and profitability, (3) our growth strategies, (4) anticipated trends in our industry, (5) our future financing plans, (6) our anticipated needs for working capital, (7) our lack of operational experience and (8) the benefits related to ownership of our common stock. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These statements constitute forward-looking statements. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. These statements may be found under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” as well as in this filing generally. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under Item 1A below and other risks and matters described in this filing and in our other SEC filings. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this filing will in fact occur as projected. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

The Company

Overview

We are a mining company that was formed in Nevada on July 2, 2007. As a mining company, we are engaged in the production of previous metals. Our activities are not limited to production and they also include acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties, primarily for gold, from owned mining properties. Inception Mining has acquired two projects, as described below. Our target properties are those that have been the subject of historical exploration. We have generated revenue from mining operations.

On October 2, 2015, the Company consummated a merger with Clavo Rico Ltd. (“Clavo Rico”). Clavo Rico is a privately held Turks and Caicos company with principal operations in Honduras, Central America. Clavo Rico operates the Clavo Rico mining concession through its subsidiaries Compañía Minera Cerros del Sur, S.A de C.V. and Compañía Minera Clavo Rico, S.A. de C.V. and holds other mining concessions. Its workings include several historical underground mining operations dating back to the early Mayan and Spanish occupation.

On January 11, 2016, the Company authorized a 5.5:1 reverse stock split on its shares of common stock with a record date of January 11, 2016. The reverse split has not yet been approved and announced by FINRA.

On February 25, 2013, the Company acquired certain real property and the associated exploration permits and mineral rights commonly known as the U.P. and Burlington Gold Mine (“UP & Burlington”) pursuant to that certain asset purchase agreement entered between the Company, its majority shareholder (the “Majority Shareholder”), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Inception Development Inc. (the “Subsidiary”) on one hand, and Inception Resources on the other hand, dated February 25, 2013 (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”). We are presently in the exploration stage at UP & Burlington. UP & Burlington contains two Federal patented mining claims which Inception Resources acquired for the purpose of the exploration and potential development of gold on the 40 acres which comprises UP & Burlington.

As part of our initial Plan of Operations for UP & Burlington, we have two-phases. During Phase I, we have obtained the necessary permitting to make an additional access road and surface improvements. We have implemented a bulk sample project on the surface of a 2,500 foot per day-lighted vein to depths of 40-60 feet. We plan to implement a Confirmatory Core Drilling Program that will be (NI43-101) compliant, with Vein Definition and Ore Valuation. In Phase II, we plan to contract an underground mining and operations plan, expand portal development leveraging existing underground access and implement underground mining to a depth based on optimizing costs versus processed ore value. There is no guarantee that we will be successful in implementing either Phase I or Phase II.

The Company and its independent consultants have developed a detailed exploration-drilling program to confirm and expand mineralized zones in these mines and collect additional environmental and technical data. The first phase of confirmation and expansion will begin in 2015 and the Company intends to continue evaluation, metallurgical testing, engineering and environmental programs and studies during 2016 and soon thereafter update the historic feasibility study and environmental permit applications.

We also plan to review opportunities and acquire additional mineral properties with current or historic precious and base metal mineralization with meaningful exploration potential.

Competition and Mineral Prices

We compete with many companies in the mining business, including larger, more established mining companies with substantial capabilities, personnel and financial resources. There is a limited supply of desirable mineral lands available for claim-staking, lease or acquisition in the United States and other areas where we may conduct exploration activities. Because we compete with individuals and companies that have greater financial resources and larger technical staffs, we may be at a competitive disadvantage in acquiring desirable mineral properties. From time to time, specific properties or areas that would otherwise be attractive to us for exploration or acquisition are unavailable due to their previous acquisition by other companies or our lack of financial resources. Competition in the mining industry is not limited to the acquisition of mineral properties but also extends to the technical expertise to find, advance, and operate such properties; the labor to operate the properties; and the capital needed to fund the acquisition and operation of such properties. Competition may result in our company being unable not only to acquire desired properties, but to recruit or retain qualified employees, to obtain equipment and personnel to assist in our exploration activities or to acquire the capital necessary to fund our operation and advance our properties. Our inability to compete with other companies for these resources would have a material adverse effect on our results of operation and business. The mineral exploration industry is highly fragmented, and we are a very small participant in this sector. Many of our competitors explore for a variety of minerals and control many different properties around the world. Many of them have been in business longer than we have and have established strategic partnerships and relationships and have greater financial resources than we do.

There is significant competition for properties suitable for gold exploration. As a result, we may be unable to continue to acquire interests in attractive properties on terms that we consider acceptable. We will be subject to competition and unforeseen limited sources of supplies in the industry in the event spot shortages arise for supplies such as dynamite, and certain equipment such as drill rigs, bulldozers and excavators that we will need to conduct exploration. If we are unsuccessful in securing the products, equipment and services we need we may have to suspend our exploration plans until we are able to secure them.

Market for Gold

In the event that gold is produced from our property, we believe that wholesale purchasers for the gold would be readily available, as many purchasers of precious metals exist in the United States and abroad. Among the largest are Handy & Harman, Engelhard Industries and Johnson Matthey, Ltd. Historically, these markets are liquid and volatile. Wholesale purchase prices for precious metals can be affected by a number of factors, all of which are beyond our control, including but not limited to:

fluctuation in the supply of, demand, and market price for gold;

mining activities of our competitors;

sale or purchase of gold by central banks and for investment purposes by individuals and financial institutions;

interest rates;

currency exchange rates;

inflation or deflation;

fluctuation in the value of the United States dollar and other currencies; and

political and economic conditions of major gold or other mineral-producing countries.

If we find gold that is deemed of economic grade and in sufficient quantities to justify removal, we may seek additional capital through equity or debt financing to build a mine and processing facility, or enter into joint venture or other arrangements with large and more experienced companies better able to fund ongoing exploration and development work, or find some other entity to mine our property on our behalf, or sell or lease our rights to mine the gold. Upon mining, the ore would be processed through a series of steps that produces a rough concentrate. This rough concentrate is then sold to refiners and smelters for the value of the minerals that it contains, less the cost of further concentrating, refining and smelting. Refiners and smelters then sell the gold on the open market through brokers who work for wholesalers including the major wholesalers listed above. We have not found any gold as of today, and there is no assurance that we will find any gold in the future.

Compliance with Government Regulation

Mining Operations

UP and BURLINGTON (Lemhi County, Idaho)

Mine operation is governed by both federal and state law. We will be required to comply with all regulations, rules and directives of governmental authorities and agencies applicable to the exploration of minerals in the United States generally. Federal laws, such as those governing the purchase, transport or storage of explosives, and those governing mine safety and health, also apply. The Company plans to obtain a Lemhi County Conditional Use Permit, an Idaho Department of Lands Surface Reclamation Bond and permitting for the U.S. Forest Service Access Road.

When this mine comes into production we will also be subject to the rules and regulations of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, a Division of the United States Department of Labor.

CLAVO RICO (Honduras, Central America)

The mining operations in Honduras are governed by the national entities Honduran Institute of Geology and Mines (INHGEOMIN) and Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (SERNA). The Clavo Rico mine has operated under a grandfathered concession granted many years ago and has now complied with all regulatory requirements of the above agencies and the recently adopted Honduran Mining laws (The General Mining Law was approved by Legislative Decree No. 238-2012, dated January 23, 2013), including employee health and safety regulations, Environmental requirements, water discharge requirements, and potential reclamation requirements. As the above ministries have only limited operational experience and the new mining law has only recently been adopted, the interpretation, adoption and enforcement of many regulations are evolving. Other local ordinances (municipality of El Corpus) minor and most regulatory efforts are as a result of interaction between the mine and the local populace, (examples include use of the mine haul road for local traffic, restricting mine operations to daylight hours for noise considerations, watering for dust control, etc.) where no regulation or law exists, we have attempted to duplicate best practices as required in other business climates.

These laws and regulations are continually changing and, as a general matter, are becoming more restrictive. The Company’s policy is to conduct our business in a manner that safeguards public health and mitigates the environmental effects of our business activities. To comply with these laws and regulations, we have made, and in the future may be required to make, capital and operating expenditures.

Environmental Laws

Mining activities at the Company’s properties are also subject to various environmental laws, both federal and state, including but not limited to the federal National Environmental Policy Act, CERCLA (as defined below), the Resource Recovery and Conservation Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act, and certain Idaho state laws governing the discharge of pollutants and the use and discharge of water. Various permits from federal and state agencies are required under many of these laws. Local laws and ordinances may also apply to such activities as construction of facilities, land use, waste disposal, road use and noise levels.

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA), imposes strict, joint, and several liabilities on parties associated with releases or threats of releases of hazardous substances. Liable parties include, among others, the current owners and operators of facilities at which hazardous substances were disposed or released into the environment and past owners and operators of properties who owned such properties at the time of such disposal or release. This liability could include response costs for removing or remediating the release and damages to natural resources. Our properties, because of past mining activities, could give rise to potential liability under CERCLA.

Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and related state laws, mining companies may incur costs for generating, transporting, treating, storing, or disposing of hazardous or solid wastes associated with certain mining-related activities. RCRA costs may also include corrective action or cleanup costs.

Mining operations may produce air emissions, including fugitive dust and other air pollutants, from stationary equipment, such as crushers and storage facilities, and from mobile sources such as trucks and heavy construction equipment. All of these sources are subject to review, monitoring, permitting, and/or control requirements under the federal Clean Air Act and related state air quality laws. Air quality permitting rules may impose limitations on our production levels or create additional capital expenditures in order to comply with the permitting conditions.

Under the federal Clean Water Act and the delegated Colorado water-quality program, point-source discharges into waters of the State are regulated by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Storm water discharges also are regulated and permitted under that statute. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill material into Waters of the United States, including wetlands. All of those programs may impose permitting and other requirements on our operations.

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires an assessment of the environmental impacts of major federal actions. The federal action requirement must be satisfied if the project involves federal land or if the federal government provides financing or permitting approvals. NEPA does not establish any substantive standards, but requires the analysis of any potential impacts. The scope of the assessment process depends on the size of the project. An Environmental Assessment (EA) may be adequate for smaller projects. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which is much more detailed and broader in scope than an EA, is required for larger projects. NEPA compliance requirements for any of our proposed projects could result in additional costs or delays.

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of the U.S. Department of Interior. The purpose of the ESA is to conserve and recover listed endangered and threatened species and their habitat. Under the ESA, endangered means that a species is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. The term threatened under such statute means that a species is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future. Under the ESA, it is unlawful to take a listed species, which can include harassing or harming members of such species or significantly modifying their habitat. Future identification of endangered species or habitat in our project areas may delay or adversely affect our operations.

U.S. federal and state reclamation requirements often mandate concurrent reclamation and require permitting in addition to the posting of reclamation bonds, letters of credit or other financial assurance sufficient to guarantee the cost of reclamation. If reclamation obligations are not met, the designated agency could draw on these bonds or letters of credit to fund expenditures for reclamation requirements. Reclamation requirements generally include stabilizing, contouring and re-vegetating disturbed lands, controlling drainage from portals and waste rock dumps, removing roads and structures, neutralizing or removing process solutions, monitoring groundwater at the mining site, and maintaining visual aesthetics.

Capital Equipment and Research & Development Expenditures

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we did not incur any expense related to research and development. Additionally, we are not currently conducting any research and development activities other than those relating to the possible acquisition of new gold and/or silver properties or projects of which there is no guarantee. As we proceed with our exploration programs, we may need to engage additional contractors and consider the possibility of adding additional permanent employees, as well as the possible purchase or lease of equipment.

Employees

As of the date of this filing, we currently employ ninety-five (95) full-time employees and generally around twenty-one (21) temporary employees in the United States and Honduras. We have contracts with various independent contractors and consultants to fulfill additional needs, including investor relations, exploration, development, permitting, and other administrative functions, and may staff further with employees as we expand activities and bring new projects on line.

Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty Agreements or Labor Contracts

We do not currently own any patents or trademarks. Also, we are not a party to any license or franchise agreements, concessions, royalty agreements or labor contracts arising from any patents or trademarks.

Company Information

The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is www.sec.gov. Further information about the Company may be found at its website: www.inceptionmining.com. The Company makes available its filings to investors, free of charge, on this website.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the following risks, along with all of the other information included in this report, before deciding to buy our common stock. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also impair our business operations. If we are unable to prevent events that have a negative effect from occurring, then our business may suffer.

Risks Relating to Our Company

We have incurred losses since our inception in 2007 and may never be profitable, which raises doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Since our inception in 2007, we have had nominal operations and incurred operating losses. As of December 31, 2015, our accumulated deficit since inception was $30,353,270. We have substantial current obligations and at December 31, 2015, we had $34,886,375 of current liabilities compared to only $1,140,777 of current assets. Since inception, we have been able to raise only minimal additional capital, and we have minimal cash on hand. Accordingly, the Company does not have sufficient cash resources or current assets to pay its current obligations, and we have been meeting many of our obligations through the issuance of our common stock to our employees, consultants and advisors as payment for the goods and services.

Our management continues to search for additional financing; however, considering the difficult U.S. and global economic conditions along with the substantial turmoil in the capital and credit markets, there is a significant possibility that we will be unable to obtain financing to continue our operations.

As we are in the beginning stages of our exploration activities on UP & Burlington, and such property has not generated revenue in the recent past, we expect to incur additional losses in the foreseeable future, and such losses may continue to be significant. To become profitable, we must be successful in raising capital to continue with our mining efforts, exploration activities, meet the work commitment requirements on UP & Burlington and Clavo Rico, discover economically feasible mineralization deposits and establish reserves, successfully develop the properties and finally realize adequate prices on our minerals in the marketplace. It could be years before we receive any revenues from gold production, if ever. Thus, we may never be profitable.

These circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern as described in an explanatory paragraph to our independent registered public accounting firm’s report on our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. If we are unable to continue as a going concern, investors will likely lose all of their investment in our company.

We have a limited operating history.

As an early stage company that has recently made acquisitions, we are subject to all the risks inherent in the initial organization, financing, expenditures, complications, and delays inherent in a new business. Investors should evaluate an investment in us in light of the uncertainties encountered by developing companies in a competitive environment. Our business is dependent upon the implementation of our business plan. There can be no assurance that our efforts will be successful or that we will ultimately be able to attain profitability. Additionally, the Company’s recent merger with the operating foreign entity was based on a review of all historical data and potential revenue streams and resources as could be ascertained from the submission of documents and a thorough review of all data made available. We believe the materials to be accurate and have attempted to discount the valuations due to perceived risks of foreign operations and the tasks of incorporating a non-public entity into inception.

The feasibility of mineral extraction from UP & Burlington has not yet been established, as we have not completed exploration or other work necessary to determine if it is commercially feasible to develop the properties.

UP & Burlington does not have any proven or probable reserves. A “reserve,” as defined by the SEC, is that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. A reserve requires a feasibility study demonstrating with reasonable certainty that the deposit can be economically extracted and produced. We have not yet completed our feasibility study with regard to UP & Burlington. As a result, we currently have no reserves and there are no assurances that we will be able to prove that there are reserves on UP & Burlington.

Exploring for gold is an inherently speculative business.

Natural resource exploration, and exploring for gold in particular, is a business that by its nature is very speculative. There is a strong possibility that we will not discover gold or any other resources that can be mined or extracted at a profit. Even if we do discover gold or other deposits, the deposit may not be of the quality or size necessary for us to make a profit after extracting it. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Unusual or unexpected geological formations, geological formation pressures, fires, power outages, labor disruptions, flooding, explosions, cave-ins, landslides, and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labor are just some of the many risks involved in mineral exploration programs and the subsequent development of gold deposits.

We will require significant additional capital to continue our exploration activities, and, if warranted, to develop mining operations.

We will be required to raise significantly more capital in order to develop UP & Burlington for mining production, assuming economically viable reserves exist. There is no assurance that our investments in UP & Burlington will be financially productive. We will also be required to raise significantly more capital in order to fund our Clavo Rico operations. Our ability to obtain necessary funding depends upon a number of factors, including the price of gold, base metals, and other minerals we are able to mine, the status of the national and worldwide economy, and the availability of funds in the capital markets. If we are unable to obtain the required financing in the near future for these or other purposes, our exploration activities would be delayed or indefinitely postponed, we would likely may lose our lease and options to acquire an ownership interest in UP & Burlington and be unable to fund our operations at the Clavo Rico mine in Honduras. This would likely lead to failure of our Company. Even if financing is available, it may be on terms that are not favorable to us, in which case, our ability to become profitable or to continue operating would be adversely affected. If we are unable to raise funds, the market value of our securities will likely decline, and our investors may lose some or all of their investment.

The global financial conditions may have an impact on our business and financial condition in ways that we currently cannot predict.

The continued pressure on commodities markets and related turmoil in the global financial system may have an impact on our business and financial position. The recent high costs of consumables may negatively impact costs of our operations. In addition, current financial market conditions may limit our ability to raise capital through credit and equity markets. As discussed further below, the prices of the metals that we may produce are affected by a number of factors, and it is unknown how these factors will be impacted by a continuation of the financial crisis.

Fluctuating gold and mineral prices could negatively impact our business plan.

The potential for profitability of our gold and mineral mining operations and the value of any mining properties we may acquire will be directly related to the market price of gold and minerals that we mine. Historically, gold and other mineral prices have widely fluctuated, and are influenced by a wide variety of factors, including inflation, currency fluctuations, regional and global demand, and political and economic conditions. Fluctuations in the price of gold and other minerals that we mine may have a significant influence on the market price of our common stock and a prolonged decline in these prices will have a negative effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our business is subject to extensive environmental regulations which may make exploring for or mining prohibitively expensive, and which may change at any time.

All of our operations are subject to extensive environmental regulations, which could make exploration expensive or prohibit it altogether. We may be subject to potential liabilities associated with the pollution of the environment and the disposal of waste products that may occur as the result of exploring and other related activities on our properties. We may have to pay to remedy environmental pollution, which may reduce the amount of money that we have available to use for exploration. This may adversely affect our financial position, which may cause you to lose your investment. If we are unable to fully remedy an environmental problem, we might be required to suspend operations or to enter into interim compliance measures pending the completion of the required remedy. If a decision is made to mine our properties and we retain any operational responsibility for doing so, our potential exposure for remediation may be significant, and this may have a material adverse effect upon our business and financial position. We have not yet purchased insurance for potential environmental risks (including potential liability for pollution or other hazards associated with the disposal of waste products from our exploration activities). However, if we mine one or more of our properties and retain operational responsibility for mining, then such insurance may not be available to us on reasonable terms or at a reasonable price. All of our exploration and, if warranted, development activities may be subject to regulation under one or more local, state and federal environmental impact analyses and public review processes. It is possible that future changes in applicable laws, regulations and permits or changes in their enforcement or regulatory interpretation could have significant impact on some portion of our business, which may require our business to be economically re-evaluated from time to time. These risks include, but are not limited to, the risk that regulatory authorities may increase bonding requirements beyond our financial capability. Inasmuch as posting of bonding in accordance with regulatory determinations is a condition to the right to operate under all material operating permits, increases in bonding requirements could prevent operations even if we are in full compliance with all substantive environmental laws.

We may be denied the government licenses and permits which we need to explore on our properties. In the event that we discover commercially exploitable deposits, we may be denied the additional government licenses and permits which we will need to mine our properties.

Exploration activities usually require the granting of permits from various governmental agencies. For example, exploration drilling on unpatented mineral claims requires a permit to be obtained from the United States Bureau of Land Management, which may take several months or longer to grant the requested permit. Depending on the size, location and scope of the exploration program, additional permits may also be required before exploration activities can be undertaken. Prehistoric or Indian grave yards, threatened or endangered species, archeological sites or the possibility thereof, difficult access, excessive dust and important nearby water resources may all result in the need for additional permits before exploration activities can commence. As with all permitting processes, there is the risk that unexpected delays and excessive costs may be experienced in obtaining required permits. The needed permits may not be granted at all. Delays in or our inability to obtain necessary permits will result in unanticipated costs, which may result in serious adverse effects upon our business.

The values of our properties are subject to volatility in the price of gold and any other deposits we may seek or locate.

Our ability to obtain additional and continuing funding, and our profitability in the event we ever commence mining operations or sell our rights to mine, will be significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold. Further, the gold deposits that are recovered from our Clavo Rico mine with also be subject to the volatility in the price of gold. Gold prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors, all of which are beyond our control. Some of these factors include the sale or purchase of gold by central banks and financial institutions; interest rates; currency exchange rates; inflation or deflation; fluctuation in the value of the United States dollar and other currencies; speculation; global and regional supply and demand, including investment, industrial and jewelry demand; and the political and economic conditions of major gold or other mineral producing countries throughout the world, such as Russia and South Africa. The price of gold or other minerals have fluctuated widely in recent years, and a decline in the price of gold could cause a significant decrease in the value of our properties, limit our ability to raise money, and render continued exploration and development of our properties impracticable. If that happens, then we could lose our rights to our properties and be compelled to sell some or all of these rights. Additionally, the future development of our properties beyond the exploration stage is heavily dependent upon the level of gold prices remaining sufficiently high to make the development of our properties economically viable. You may lose your investment if the price of gold decreases. The greater the decrease in the price of gold, the more likely it is that you will lose money.

Our property titles may be challenged. We are not insured against any challenges, impairments or defects to our mineral claims or property titles. We have not fully verified title to our properties.

Our future unpatented claims will be created and maintained in accordance with the federal General Mining Law of 1872. Unpatented claims are unique U.S. property interests and are generally considered to be subject to greater title risk than other real property interests because the validity of unpatented claims is often uncertain. This uncertainty arises, in part, out of the complex federal and state laws and regulations under the General Mining Law. Defending any challenges to our future property titles may be costly, and may divert funds that could otherwise be used for exploration activities and other purposes. In addition, unpatented claims are always subject to possible challenges by third parties or contests by the federal government, which, if successful, may prevent us from exploiting our discovery of commercially extractable gold. Challenges to our title may increase our costs of operation or limit our ability to explore on certain portions of our properties. We are not insured against challenges, impairments or defects to our property titles, nor do we intend to carry extensive title insurance in the future. Potential conflicts to our mineral claims are discussed in detail elsewhere herein.

Honduran mining operations have increased exposure.

Sustaining foreign mining operations, such as those in Honduras, comes with increased uncertainty, due to less stable governments, political interruptions, volatility in taxes and fees, implementation of new laws and regulations, and more. The effect of this exposure can lead to closure of operations, nationalization, and strikes, all of which are beyond the company’s control. Granting and maintaining concessions is highly subject to political whim and maintaining the concessions is subject to a number of factors and variables beyond the company’s control. We do not currently insure against these interruptions but have chosen to structure our operations to minimize exposure to capital assets by subcontracting major areas of work, and to otherwise keep our financial exposure limited even at the expense of operation costs and our bottom line.

Foreign operations involve numerous risks associated with fluctuating exchange rates and other financial risks.

Foreign operations involve numerous risks associated with fluctuating exchange rates and with increasing taxes and fees associated with importing of necessary goods, equipment and services not adequately found in country and with exporting of the finished gold doré. Recent enactment of the Honduran mining laws has helped stabilize the fees, but continual review by the various government operations, and central bank subject the historical operations to review and could impact our ability to export on a timely basis and/or face possible fines etc. associated with repatriation of past revenues, etc.

Possible amendments to the General Mining Law could make it more difficult or impossible for us to execute our business plan.

The U.S. Congress has considered proposals to amend the General Mining Law of 1872 that would have, among other things, permanently banned the sale of public land for mining. The proposed amendment would have expanded the environmental regulations to which we might be subject and would have given Indian tribes the ability to hinder or prohibit mining operations near tribal lands. The proposed amendment would also have imposed a royalty of 8% of gross revenue on new mining operations located on federal public land, which might have applied to our future properties. The proposed amendment would have made it more expensive or perhaps too expensive to recover any otherwise commercially exploitable gold deposits which we might find on our future properties. While at this time the proposed amendment is no longer pending, this or similar changes to the law in the future could have a significant impact on our business model.

Market forces or unforeseen developments may prevent us from obtaining the supplies and equipment necessary to explore for gold and other resources.

Gold exploration, and resource exploration in general, demands contractors available for such work, and unforeseen shortages of supplies and/or equipment could result in the disruption of our planned exploration activities. Current demand for exploration drilling services, equipment and supplies is robust and could result in suitable equipment and skilled manpower being unavailable at scheduled times for our exploration program. Fuel prices are extremely volatile as well. We will attempt to locate suitable equipment, materials, manpower and fuel if sufficient funds are available. If we cannot find the equipment and supplies needed for our various exploration programs, we may have to suspend some or all of them until equipment, supplies, funds and/or skilled manpower become available. Any such disruption in our activities may adversely affect our exploration activities and financial condition.

We may not be able to maintain the infrastructure necessary to conduct exploration activities.

Our exploration activities depend upon adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges, power sources, and water supply are important factors that affect capital and operating costs. Unusual or infrequent weather phenomena, sabotage, government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure could adversely affect our exploration activities and financial condition.

Our exploration activities may be adversely affected by the local climates, which could prevent or impair us from exploring our properties year round.

The local climate in our area of operations may impair or prevent us from conducting exploration activities on our properties year round. Because of its rural location and limited infrastructure in this area, our property is generally impassible for several days each year as a result of significant rain or snow events. Earthquakes, heavy rains, snowstorms, and floods could result in serious damage to or the destruction of facilities, equipment or means of access to our properties, or may otherwise prevent us from conducting exploration activities on our properties.

We do not currently carry any property or casualty insurance.

Our business is subject to a number of risks and hazards generally, including but not limited to, adverse environmental conditions, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, ground or slope failures, cave-ins, changes in the regulatory environment, and natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions, floods and earthquakes. Such occurrences could result in damage to our properties, equipment, infrastructure, personal injury or death, environmental damage, delays, monetary losses and possible legal liability. You could lose all or part of your investment if any such catastrophic event occurs. We do not carry any property or casualty insurance at this time (but we will carry all insurances that we are required to by law, such as motor vehicle and workers’ compensation, plus other coverage that may be in the best interest of the Company). Even if we do obtain insurance, it may not cover all of the risks associated with our operations. Insurance against risks such as environmental pollution or other hazards as a result of exploration and operations are often not available to us or to other companies in our business on acceptable terms. Should any events against which we are not insured actually occur, we may become subject to substantial losses, costs and liabilities, which will adversely affect our financial condition.

Reclamation obligations could require significant additional expenditures.

We are responsible for the reclamation obligations related to any exploratory and mining activities. The satisfaction of current and future bonding requirements and reclamation obligations will require a significant amount of capital. There is a risk we will be unable to fund these additional bonding requirements, and further, increases to our bonding requirements or excessive actual reclamation costs will negatively affect our financial position and results of operation.

Title to mineral properties can be uncertain, and we are at risk of loss of ownership of our property.

Our ability to explore and mine future leased and optioned properties depends on the validity of title to that property. These uncertainties relate to such things as the sufficiency of mineral discovery, proper posting and marking of boundaries, failure to meet statutory guidelines, assessment work and possible conflicts with other claims not determinable from descriptions of record. Since a substantial portion of all mineral exploration, development and mining in the United States now occurs on unpatented mining claims, this uncertainty is inherent in the mining industry. Thus, there may be challenges to the title to future properties, which, if successful, could impair development and/or operations.

The probability of a mining claim having the necessary quantity and quality to result in a profitable mining operation is uncertain, and our claims, even with large investments by us, may never generate a profit.

We are dependent upon the successful exploration of our mining property and the discovery of valuable mineralization on the property. All anticipated future revenues would come directly or indirectly from the UP & Burlington and Clavo Rico projects. Should we fail to locate economically extractable mineralization on our property, or enter into an agreement to option and sell our interests to some other mining operation, we will have no revenue and our business will fail.

Our ongoing operations and past mining activities of others are subject to environmental risks, which could expose us to significant liability and delay, suspension or termination of our operations.

Mining exploration and exploitation activities are subject to federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies, including laws regulating the removal of natural resources from the ground and the discharge of materials into the environment. These regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards and land reclamation. They also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Exploration and exploitation activities are also subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations which seek to maintain health and safety standards by regulating the design and use of exploration methods and equipment.

Environmental and other legal standards imposed by federal, state or local authorities are constantly evolving, and typically in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, and increased fines and penalties for non-compliance. Such changes may prevent us from conducting planned activities or increase our costs of doing so, which would have material adverse effects on our business. Moreover, compliance with such laws may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated, thus causing an adverse effect on us. Additionally, we may be subject to liability for pollution or other environmental damages that we may not be able to or elect not to insure against due to prohibitive premium costs and other reasons. Unknown environmental hazards may exist on UP & Burlington and/or on Clavo Rico, or we may acquire properties in the future that have unknown environmental issues caused by previous owners or operators, or that may have occurred naturally.

We could be exposed to significant liability for violations of hazardous substances laws because of the use or presence of such substances at our project.

Our mining operations are subject to numerous federal, state, and local statutory and regulatory standards relating to the use, storage, and disposal of hazardous substances. We use cyanide, propane and industrial lubricants and other substances at our mining locations, which are or could become classified as hazardous substances. If it is discovered that any hazardous substances have been released into the environment at or by the project in concentrations that exceed regulatory limits, we could become liable for the investigation and removal of those substances, regardless of their source and time of release. If we fail to comply with these laws, ordinances or regulations (or any change thereto), we could be subject to civil or criminal liability, the imposition of liens or fines, and large expenditures to bring the project into compliance. Furthermore, we may be held liable for the cleanup of releases of hazardous substances at other locations where we arranged for disposal of those substances, even if we did not cause the release at that location. The cost of any remediation activities in connection with a spill or other release of such substances could be significant.

UP & Burlington and Clavo Rico are subject to royalties on production.

As part of our purchase of UP & Burlington, we granted a Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”) of 3%. Additionally, our Clavo Rico project has a NSR of 5% in addition to a refinery royalty of 3%. In addition, claims made by currently-unknown third parties for historical royalties may be asserted against us.

Our industry is highly competitive, attractive mineral lands are scarce, and we may not be able to obtain quality properties.

We compete with many companies in the mining industry, including large, established mining companies with capabilities, personnel and financial resources that far exceed our limited resources. In addition, there is a limited supply of desirable mineral lands available for claim-staking, lease or acquisition in the United States, and other areas where we may conduct exploration activities. We are at a competitive disadvantage in acquiring mineral properties, since we compete with these larger individuals and companies, many of which have greater financial resources and larger technical staffs. Likewise, our competition extends to locating and employing competent personnel and contractors to prospect, develop and operate mining properties. Many of our competitors can offer attractive compensation packages that we may not be able to meet. Such competition may result in our company being unable not only to acquire desired properties, but to recruit or retain qualified employees or to acquire the capital necessary to fund our operation and advance our properties. Our inability to compete with other companies for these resources would have a material adverse effect on our results of operation and business.

We depend on our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and the loss of these individuals could adversely affect our business.

Our company is completely dependent on our Chief Executive Officer, Michael Ahlin, and our Chief Financial Officer, Trent D’Ambrosio who are also members of our Board of Directors. As of the date of this report the two are significant to the company. Thus, the loss of either Ahlin or D’Ambrosio could significantly and adversely affect our business, and certainly the loss of both of these individuals on or about the same time could result in a complete failure of the Company. We do not carry any life insurance on the life of Ahlin or D’Ambrosio.

The nature of mineral exploration and production activities involves a high degree of risk and the possibility of uninsured losses that could materially and adversely affect our operations.

Exploration for minerals is highly speculative and involves greater risk than many other businesses. Many exploration programs do not result in the discovery of economically feasible mineralization. Few properties that are explored are ultimately advanced to the stage of producing mines. We are subject to all of the operating hazards and risks normally incident to exploring for and developing mineral properties such as, but not limited to:

economically insufficient mineralized material;

fluctuations in production costs that may make mining uneconomical;

labor disputes;

unanticipated variations in grade and other geologic problems;

environmental hazards;

water conditions;

difficult surface or underground conditions;

industrial accidents, such as personal injury, fire, flooding, cave-ins, and landslides;

metallurgical and other processing problems;

mechanical and equipment performance problems; and

decreases in revenues and reserves due to lower gold and mineral prices.

Any of these risks can materially and adversely affect, among other things, the development of properties, production quantities and rates, costs and expenditures and production commencement dates. We currently have no insurance to guard against any of these risks. If we determine that capitalized costs associated with any of our mineral interests are not likely to be recovered, we would incur a write-down of our investment in these interests. All of these factors may result in losses in relation to amounts spent that are not recoverable.

Our operations are subject to permitting requirements that could require us to delay, suspend or terminate our operations on our mining property.

Our operations and exploration activities require permits from the local, state and federal governments. We may be unable to obtain these permits in a timely manner, on reasonable terms or at all. If we cannot obtain or maintain the necessary permits, or if there is a delay in receiving these permits, our timetable and business plan for Inception will be adversely affected.

We may never find commercially viable gold or other reserves on UP and Burlington.

Mineral exploration and development involve a high degree of risk and few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. We cannot assure you that any future mineral exploration and development activities will result in any discoveries of proven or probable reserves as defined by the SEC since such discoveries are remote. Nor can we provide any assurance that, even if we discover commercial quantities of mineralization, a mineral property will be brought into commercial production. Development of our mineral properties will follow only upon obtaining sufficient funding and satisfactory exploration results.

Mineral deposit estimates are imprecise and subject to error.

Mineral deposit estimation calculations may prove unreliable. Assumptions made regarding the supporting data may prove inaccurate and unforeseen events may lead to further inaccuracies. Sample variability, mining and processing adjustments, environmental changes, metal price fluctuations, and law and regulation changes are all factors that could lead to deviances from any original estimations. Despite future investment in exploration activities, there is no guarantee we will locate additional commercially viable ore deposits or reserves. Most exploration projects do not result in discovery of commercially viable and mineable ore deposits. With little capital available, we will have to limit our exploration, which decreases the chances of finding a commercially viable ore body. Even if potentially promising mineralization is identified at UP & Burlington, we may choose to not begin production due to high extraction costs, low gold prices, or inadequate amount and reduced recovery rates. Further, we may cease our production operations at Clavo Rico due to high extraction costs, low gold prices, or inadequate amount and reduced recovery rates. If exploration activities do not suggest a commercially successful prospect, then we may altogether abandon plans to pursue efforts to further develop these properties.

Historical production of gold at UP & Burlington and Clavo Rico may not be indicative of the potential for future development or revenue.

Historical production of gold and minerals from UP & Burlington and Clavo Rico cannot be relied upon as an indication that these mines will have commercially feasible reserves. Investors in our securities should not rely on historical operations of UP & Burlington and Clavo Rico as an indication that we will be able to place them into commercial production again. We expect to incur losses unless and until such time as the properties enter into commercial production and generate sufficient revenue to fund our continuing operations.

Our independent auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

In their audit opinion issued in connection with our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and our related consolidated statements of operations, deficiency in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015, our auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern given our recurring net losses, negative cash flows from operations and the limited amount of funds on our balance sheet. We have prepared our financial statements on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in existence. This could make it more difficult to raise capital in the future.

Risks Associated with Our Common Stock

Trading on the Over the Counter markets may be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their shares.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink tier of the over-the-counter markets administered by OTC Markets Group, Inc under the symbol “IMII”. Trading in stock quoted on over the counter markets is often thin, volatile, and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the over the counter markets are not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the over the counter markets is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on other stock exchanges such as the NASDAQ Stock Market, New York Stock Exchange or American Stock Exchange. Accordingly, our shareholders may have difficulty reselling any of their shares.

Our stock is a penny stock. Trading of our stock may be restricted by the SEC’s penny stock regulations and the FINRA’s sales practice requirements, which may limit a stockholders’ ability to buy and sell our stock.

Our stock is a penny stock. The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. The term accredited investor refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customers’ account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage broker-dealer and investor interest in, and limit the marketability of, our common stock.

Our common stock may be affected by limited trading volume and price fluctuation which could adversely impact the value of our common stock.

There has been limited trading in our common stock and there can be no assurance that an active trading market in our common stock will either develop or be maintained. Our common stock has experienced, and is likely to experience in the future, significant price and volume fluctuations which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, we believe that factors such as quarterly fluctuations in our financial results and changes in the overall economy or the condition of the financial markets could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. These fluctuations may also cause short sellers to periodically enter the market in the belief that we will have poor results in the future. We cannot predict the actions of market participants and, therefore, can offer no assurances that the market for our common stock will be stable or appreciate over time.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholders’ ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the penny stock rules promulgated by the SEC, which are discussed in the immediately preceding risk factor, FINRA rules require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit the ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market value for our shares.

Because the SEC imposes additional sales practice requirements on brokers who deal in shares of penny stocks, some brokers may be unwilling to trade our securities. This means that you may have difficulty reselling your shares, which may cause the value of your investment to decline.

Our shares are classified as penny stocks and are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell our securities in this offering or in the aftermarket. For sales of our securities, broker-dealers must make a special suitability determination and receive a written agreement prior from you to making a sale on your behalf. Because of the imposition of the foregoing additional sales practices, it is possible that broker-dealers will not want to make a market in our common stock. This could prevent you from reselling your shares and may cause the value of your investment to decline.

A decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital, it may adversely impact our ability to continue operations and we may go out of business.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because we may attempt to acquire a significant portion of the funds we need in order to conduct our planned operations through the sale of equity securities, or convertible debt instruments, a decline in the price of our common stock could be detrimental to our liquidity and our operations because the decline may cause investors to not choose to invest in our stock. If we are unable to raise the funds we require for all our planned operations, we may be forced to reallocate funds from other planned uses and may suffer a significant negative effect on our business plan and operations, including our ability to develop new products and continue our current operations. a result, our business may suffer, and not be successful and we may go out of business. We also might not be able to meet our financial obligations if we cannot raise enough funds through the sale of our common stock and we may be forced to go out of business.

Our stock price may be volatile.

The stock market in general has experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of any specific public company. The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

changes in our industry;

competitive pricing pressures;

our ability to obtain working capital financing;

additions or departures of key personnel;

limited “public float” in the hands of a small number of persons whose sales or lack of sales could result in positive or negative pricing pressure on the market prices of our common stock;

sales of our common stock;

our ability to execute our business plan;

operating results that fall below expectations;

loss of any strategic relationship;

regulatory developments;

economic and other external factors; and

period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We have never paid a cash dividend on our common stock and we do not anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future.

We have not paid a cash dividend on our common stock to date, and we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Our ability to pay dividends will depend on our ability to successfully develop one or more properties and generate revenue from operations. Notwithstanding, we will likely elect to retain any earnings, if any, to finance our growth. Future dividends may also be limited by bank loan agreements or other financing instruments that we may enter into in the future. The declaration and payment of dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

We have not voluntarily implemented various corporate governance measures, in the absence of which, shareholders may have more limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.

Recent federal legislation, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has resulted in the adoption of various corporate governance measures designed to promote the integrity of the corporate management and the securities markets. Some of these measures have been adopted in response to legal requirements. Others have been adopted by companies in response to the requirements of national securities exchanges, such as the NYSE or The NASDAQ Stock Market, on which their securities are listed. Among the corporate governance measures that are required under the rules of national securities exchanges and NASDAQ are those that address board of directors’ independence, audit committee oversight and the adoption of a code of ethics. While our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, we have not yet adopted any of these corporate governance measures and, since our securities are not listed on a national securities exchange or NASDAQ, we are not required to do so. It is possible that if we were to adopt some or all of these corporate governance measures, shareholders would benefit from somewhat greater assurances that internal corporate decisions were being made by disinterested directors and that policies had been implemented to define responsible conduct. For example, in the absence of audit, nominating and compensation committees comprised of at least a majority of independent directors, decisions concerning matters such as compensation packages to our senior officers and recommendations for director nominees may be made by a majority of directors who have an interest in the outcome of the matters being decided. Prospective investors should bear in mind our current lack of corporate governance measures in formulating their investment decisions.

Difficulties we may encounter managing our growth could adversely affect our results of operations.

As our business needs expand, we may need to hire a significant number of employees. This expansion may place a significant strain on our managerial and financial resources. To manage the potential growth of our operations and personnel, we will be required to:

improve existing, and implement new, operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures;

install enhanced management information systems; and

train, motivate, and manage our employees.

We may not be able to install adequate management information and control systems in an efficient and timely manner, and our current or planned personnel, systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. If we are unable to manage growth effectively, our business would be seriously harmed.

If we lose key personnel or are unable to attract and retain additional qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully manage our business and achieve our objectives.

We believe our future success will depend upon our ability to retain our key management, Mr. Ahlin, our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. D’Ambrosio, our Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Cluff our Consulting Director. We may not be successful in attracting, assimilating and retaining our employees in the future.

Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market upon the expiration of any statutory holding period, under Rule 144, or issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants, it could create a circumstance commonly referred to as an “overhang” and in anticipation of which the market price of our common stock could fall. The existence of an overhang, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could make more difficult our ability to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

UP & Burlington Gold Mine, Salmon, Lemhi County, Idaho

On February 25, 2013 the Company acquired certain real property and the associated exploration permits and mineral rights commonly known as the UP and Burlington Gold Mine (“UP & Burlington”) pursuant to an asset purchase agreement. We are presently in the exploration stage at UP & Burlington. UP & Burlington contains two federal patented mining claims, which Inception Resources acquired for the purpose of the exploration and potential development of gold on the 40 acres which comprises this property.

Discovered in 1892, UP & Burlington is a private gold property that has been held unused in a family trust for the past 75 years. UP & Burlington is located in Lemhi County, Northwest of Salmon, Idaho, at an elevation of 3,994 feet. The UP & Burlington site is located six miles from the city of Salmon; is 0.6 miles away from the closest major road (Ridge Rd.); and is 1.56 miles away from the closest major power line. We believe Salmon, along with the surrounding County of Lemhi, provides an excellent infrastructure for our mine. Salmon has a population of 3,122 and Lemhi County has a population of 7,806. In September 2011, heavy maintenance and right-of-way repair was completed and a new road to UP & Burlington was constructed.

UP & Burlington’s two gold mining claims were brought to patent in 1900, which covers the Mine’s 40 acres. Subsequently, in 1989, a U.S. Forest Survey was performed on the UP & Burlington site confirming that the patented claims cover an area that is six hundred feet by three thousand feet (600‘x3000’). The Mine’s patented claims remove the challenges associated when working on U.S. Forest lands, Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), state or other property types. With our purchase of UP & Burlington, we have the benefit of working on private land, which requires only a hauling/road permit to commence significant operations.

The Company has obtained the necessary permitting, cut additional access roads, made surface improvements, and initiated surface mining on a 2,500 foot per day lighted vein for bulk sampling, vein definition and ore valuation. In Phase II, we plan to contract an underground mining and operations plan, expand portal development leveraging existing underground access, and implement underground mining to a depth based on optimizing costs versus processed ore value. There is no guarantee that we will be successful in implementing any stage of our plans.

Our tactical plan includes obtaining a Lemhi County Conditional Use Permit, an Idaho Department of Lands Surface Reclamation Bond, and permitting for the U.S. Forest Service Access Road, as well as obtaining major contracts such as geotechnical contracts, surface mining contracts, toll processing contracts and underground mine plan contracts.

The Company and its independent consultants have developed a detailed exploration-drilling program to confirm and expand mineralized zones in the Mine and collect additional environmental and technical data. The first phase of confirmation and expansion drilling began in 2013. The Company intends to continue drilling, metallurgical testing, engineering and environmental programs and studies and has updated the historic feasibility study and environmental permit applications.

Clavo Rico Gold Mine, Honduras, Central America

The Company’s primary mine is located on the 200 hectare Clavo Rico Concession, located in southern Honduras. This mine was originally explored and exploited in the 16th century by the Spanish, and more recently has been operated by Compañía Minera Cerros del Sur, S. de R.L. as a small family business. In 2003, Clavo Rico’s predecessor purchased a 20% interest and later increased its ownership to 99.5%. This company has since invested over five million dollars in the expansion and development of the mine and surrounding properties.

Corporate Headquarters

We currently maintain our corporate offices at 5330 South 900 East STE 280, Murray, Utah 84117. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we paid monthly rent of approximately $450 for use of a corporate office, which we anticipate will be sufficient until we commence full operations.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which our property is the subject. We also know of no proceedings to which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial holders of more than 5% of any class of our securities, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or security holder are an adverse party or have a material interest adverse to us.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable as the Company conducts no mining operations in the U.S. or its territories.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is not traded on any exchange. Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink tier of the over-the-counter markets administered by OTC Markets Group, Inc under the trading symbol “IMII.” We cannot assure you that there will be a market in the future for our common stock.

OTC securities are not listed and traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTC securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers. OTCQB issuers are traditionally smaller companies that do not meet the financial and other listing requirements of a national or regional stock exchange.

The following table reflects the high and low bid information for our common stock and reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

The high and low bid prices of our common stock for the periods indicated below are as follows:

OTC Markets

Quarter Ended

October 31, 2014

January 31, 2015

April 30, 2015

July 31, 2015

September 30, 2015

December 31, 2015

October 31, 2013

January 31, 2014

April 30, 2014

July 31, 2014

Holders

As of December 31, 2015 there were 1502 holders of record of our common stock. As of April 21, 2016, there were 1,501 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

To date, we have not paid dividends on shares of our common stock and we do not expect to declare or pay dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of any dividends will depend upon our future earnings, if any, our financial condition, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.

Equity Compensation Plans

As of April 21, 2016, we have an equity compensation plan: the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

A total of 240,225,901 shares of Common Stock of the Company were issued on a pro rata basis to the then-shareholders of Clavo Rico as consideration for the Merger and to certain officers and directors. Specifically, as compensation for the work in closing the Merger Agreement and for services rendered to date, certain officers and directors were issued shares of the Company’s common stock on October 2, 2015. Whit Cluff was issued 1,375,000 shares; Trent D’Ambrosio was issued 3,855,929 shares; and Michael Ahlin was issued 2,750,000 shares. The Company’s transfer agent is holding these shares in book entry for the benefit of its new shareholders. These shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, the transactions did not involve a public offering.

On October 20, 2015, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to Firstfire Global Opportunities Fund in consideration of a note extension. These shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, the transactions did not involve a public offering.

On November 3, 2015, 250,000 shares of common stock were issued to Firstfire Global Opportunities Fund as an Extension Fee pursuant to an Amendment to the Loan Documents. These shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, the transactions did not involve a public offering.

On December 17, 2015, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock to an investor for cash. These shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, the transactions did not involve a public offering.

On January 5, 2016, 100,000 shares of common stock were issued to Brunson Chandler & Jones PLLC as payment for legal services performed for the Company. These shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, the transactions did not involve a public offering.

On January 11, 2016, the Company issued 5,194,537 shares of common stock to The Panamera Trust pursuant to the exercise of a warrant. These shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, the transactions did not involve a public offering.

On January 11, 2016, the Company issued 5,925,192 shares of common stock to Cornerstone Holdings LTD pursuant to the exercise of a warrant. These shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, the transactions did not involve a public offering.

Repurchases and Cancellations of Securities

MDL Ventures returned 250,000 shares to the Company for cancellation on November 3, 2015.

On December 15, 2015, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with Brian Brewer through which he agreed to return up to 500,000 shares of common stock in the Company. Pursuant to the terms of that Settlement Agreement, 83,335 shares of common stock were returned to the Company for cancellation on December 18, 2015, 83,333 shares of the Company were returned to the Company for cancellation on January 15, 2016, 83,333 shares of the Company were returned to the Company for cancellation on February 17, 2016, 83,333 shares of the Company were returned to the Company for cancellation on March 15, 2015, and 83,333 shares of the Company were returned to the Company for cancellation on April 20, 2016.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

This information is not required because we are a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward Looking Statements

Except for historical information, the following Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve certain risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among other things, (a) discussions about mineral resources and mineralized material, (b) our projected sales and profitability, (c) our growth strategies, (d) anticipated trends in our industry, (e) our future financing plans, (f) our anticipated needs for working capital, (g) our lack of operational experience and (h) the benefits related to ownership of our common stock. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. These statements may be found under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Description of Business,” as well as in this Report generally. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under “Risk Factors” and matters described in this Report generally. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this Report will in fact occur as projected.

On February 25, 2013, Inception Mining, Inc. (“Inception” or the “Company”) and its majority shareholder (the “Majority Shareholder”), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Inception Development Inc. (the “Subsidiary”), entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Inception Resources, LLC, a Utah corporation (“Inception Resources”), pursuant to which Inception purchased the UP & Burlington Gold Mine in consideration of 16,000,000 shares of common stock of Inception, the assumption of promissory notes in the amount of $950,000 and the assignment of a 3% net royalty. Inception Resources was an entity owned by and under the control of a shareholder. This transaction is deemed an asset purchase by entities under common control. The Asset Purchase Agreement closed on February 25, 2013 (the “Closing”). We were a “shell company” (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) immediately prior to our acquisition of the gold mine pursuant to the terms of the Assert Purchase Agreement. As a result of such acquisition, our operations are now focused on the ownership and operation of the mine acquired from Inception Resources. Consequently, we believe that acquisition has caused us to cease to be a shell company as we no longer have nominal operations.

We are a mining exploration stage company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties, primarily for gold, from owned mining properties. Inception Resources has acquired two projects, as described below. Our target properties are those that have been the subject of historical exploration. We have not generated revenue from mining operations.

On February 25, 2013, the Company acquired certain real property and the associated exploration permits and mineral rights commonly known as the UP & Burlington Gold Mine (“UP & Burlington” or the “Mine”) pursuant to that certain asset purchase agreement entered between the Company, its majority shareholder (the “Majority Shareholder”), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Inception Development Inc. (the “Subsidiary”) on one hand, and Inception Resources on the other hand, dated February 25, 2013(the “Asset Purchase Agreement”). We are presently in the exploration stage at UP & Burlington. UP & Burlington contains two Federal patented mining claims which Inception Resources acquired for the purpose of the exploration and potential development of gold on the 40 acres which comprises UP & Burlington.

UP & Burlington is a private gold property that was discovered in 1892 and has been held unused in a family trust for the past 75 years. UP & Burlington is located in County of Lemhi, Northwest of Salmon, Idaho, at an elevation of 7,994 feet. The UP & Burlington site is located six miles from the city of Salmon; is 0.6 miles away from the closest major road (Ridge Rd.); and is 1.56 miles away from the closest major power line. We believe Salmon, along with the surrounding County of Lemhi, provides an excellent infrastructure for our mine. Salmon has a population of 3,122 and Lemhi County has a population of 7,806. In September 2011, heavy maintenance and right-of-way repair was completed and a new road to UP & Burlington was constructed.

UP & Burlington’s two gold mining claims were brought to patent in 1900, which covers the Mine’s 40 acres. Subsequently, in 1989, a U.S. Forest Survey was performed on the UP & Burlington site confirming that the patented claims cover an area which is six hundred feet by three thousand feet (600‘x3000’). The Mine’s patented claims remove the challenges associated when working on U.S. Forest lands, Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), state or other property types. With our purchase of UP & Burlington, we have the benefit of working on private land, which requires only a hauling / road permit to commence significant operations.

Our Tactical Plan includes obtaining a Lemhi County Conditional Use Permit, an Idaho Department of Lands Surface Reclamation Bond and permitting for the U.S. Forest Service Access Road, as well as obtaining major contracts such as geotechnical contracts, surface mining contracts, toll processing contracts and underground mine plan contracts.

The Company and its independent consultants have developed a detailed exploration drilling program to confirm and expand mineralized zones in the Mine and collect additional environmental and technical data. The first phase of confirmation and expansion drilling will begin in 2016 and the Company intends to continue drilling, metallurgical testing, engineering and environmental programs and studies during 2016 and soon thereafter update the historic feasibility study and environmental permit applications.

Clavo Rico Mine

The Company’s primary mine is located on the 200 hectare Clavo Rico Concession, located in southern Honduras. This mine was originally explored and exploited in the 16th century by the Spanish, and more recently has been operated by Compañía Minera Cerros del Sur, S. de R.L. as a small family business. In 2003, Clavo Rico’s predecessor purchased a 20% interest and later increased its ownership to 99.9%. This company has since invested over five million dollars in the expansion and development of the mine and surrounding properties.

The operations begin by crushing ore to approximately 3/8-inch size pebbles, which is then mixed with sand and loaded on the recovery pad for processing. The ore is sprinkled with a solution that leaches the gold from the rock, and the solution is collected and processed on-site at Clavo Rico’s own ADR plant. The dore bars that result from this process are shipped to the USA for refining.

Prior to the expansion, the mine had only been processing approximately 500 tons of ore per month. The current recovery operation has been sized to handle from 500 to 1,000 tons of ore per day on a recovery bed that has the capacity to receive up to 800,000 tons of ore. This expansion represents a sizeable increase in capacity. The company commenced full operations on January 1, 2012 and believes that sufficiently high gold content ore bodies have been located and blocked out to load the recovery bed to capacity by the end of 2017.

The ore body has had some preliminary drilling undertaken by the company and the assays of samples indicate that the ore should have grades in the range of 2-5 grams of gold per ton.

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014

We had a net loss of $27,165,344 for the year ended December 31, 2015, which was $26,983,067 more than the net loss of $182,277 for the year ended December 31, 2014. This change in our results over the two periods is primarily the result of an increase in cost of goods sold of $1,237,538, an increase of $28,073,191 in interest expenses due to beneficial conversion features, a change of $(2,855,920) in derivative liabilities and an increase of $1,049,207 in general and administrative expenses primarily due to consulting expenses. The following table summarizes key items of comparison and their related increase (decrease) for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Year Ended December 31,

Increase/

(Decrease)

(Restated)

Revenues

3,524,439

3,129,773

394,666

Cost of Sales

3,742,110

2,504,572

General and Administrative

1,445,964

396,757

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

98,243

390,528

(292,285

Total Operating Expenses

5,286,317

3,291,857

1,994,460

(Loss) from Operations

(1,761,878

(162,084

1,599,794

Other Income (expense)

28,578

28,549

Change in Derivative Liabilities

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt

(30,581

Loss on Impairment of Mining Claim

(135,450

Interest Expense

(48,742

Loss from Operations Before Taxes

(182,277

Net Loss

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, reflects assets of $1,140,777. As we had cash in the amount of $137,639 and a working capital deficit in the amount of $33,745,598 as of December 31, 2015, we do not have sufficient working capital to enable us to carry out our stated plan of operation for the next twelve months.

Working Capital

December 31, 2015

December 31, 2014

Current assets

1,955,496

Current liabilities

6,645,988

Working capital deficit

(33,745,598

(4,690,492

We anticipate generating losses and, therefore, may be unable to continue operations in the future. If we require additional capital, we would have to issue debt or equity or enter into a strategic arrangement with a third party.

Going Concern Consideration

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has a net loss since inception of $30,353,270. In addition, there is a working capital deficiency of $33,745,598 and a stockholder’s deficiency of $32,040,527 as of December 31, 2015. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

From March 5, 2010, the Company changed its intended business purpose to that of precious metals mineral exploration, development and production. Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional funding and implement its strategic plans provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

Cash Flows

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

34,933

356,751

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

(377,975

(692,145

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

304,459

459,980

Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash

(2,746

(4,741

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash

(41,329

119,845

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2015 was $34,933 – a decrease of $321,818 from the $356,751 net cash provided by during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015 was $377,975 – a decrease of $314,170 from the $692,145 net cash outflow during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Financing Activities

Financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015, provided $304,459 to us, a decrease of $155,521 from the $459,980 provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the company received $675,000 from notes payable, $19,909 in advances from related parties, made payments of $305,000 in cash on notes payable and $134,450 in cash on convertible notes and received $49,000 in cash from the issuance of common stock.

Critical Accounting Policies

Going Concern -

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements during year ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred net losses of $10,239,578 and provided $34,933 in cash for operating activities. These factors among others indicate that the Company may be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

The Company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations and to obtain additional funding sources. There can be no assurance that the Company’s financing efforts will result in profitable operations or the resolution of the Company’s liquidity problems. The accompanying statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management is currently working to make changes that will result in profitable operations and to obtain additional funding sources to meet the Company’s need for cash during the next twelve months and beyond.

Principles of Consolidation -

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Inception Mining, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Inception Development, Corp., Clavo Rico Development Corp., Clavo Rico, Ltd. and Compa

a Minera Cerros del R

o, S.A. de C.V., and its controlling interest subsidiaries, Compa

a Minera Cerros del Sur, S.A. de C.V. and Compa

Minera Clavo Rico, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany accounts have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Basis of Presentation -

The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Cash and Cash Equivalents -

The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Inventories, Stockpiles and Mineralized Material on Leach Pads -

Inventories, including stockpiles and mineralized material on leach pads are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value represents the estimated future sales price of the product based on current and long-term metals prices, less the estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale. Write-downs of stockpiles, mineralized material on leach pads and inventories to net realizable value are reported as a component of costs applicable to mining revenue. Cost is comprised of production costs for mineralized material produced and processed. Production costs include the costs of materials, costs of processing, direct labor, mine site and processing facility overhead costs, stock-based compensation, and depreciation, amortization and depletion.

Stockpiles represent mineralized material that has been extracted from the mine and is available for further processing. Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of tons added and removed from the stockpile. Stockpile tonnages are verified by periodic surveys. Costs are allocated to stockpiles based on relative values of material stockpiled and processed using current mining costs incurred up to the point of stockpiling the material, including applicable overhead, depreciation, and depletion relating to mining operations, and removed at each stockpile’s average cost per ton.

Mineralized Material on Leach Pads

The Company utilizes a heap leaching process to recover gold from its mineralized material. Under this method, the mineralized material is placed on leach pads where it is treated with a chemical solution that dissolves the gold contained in the material. The resulting gold-bearing solution is further processed in a facility where the gold is recovered. Costs are added to mineralized material on leach pads based on current mining and processing costs, including applicable depreciation relating to mining and processing operations. Costs are transferred from mineralized material on leach pads to subsequent stages of in-process inventories as the gold-bearing solution is processed. The value of such transferred costs of mineralized material on leach pads is based on the average cost per estimated recoverable ounce of gold on the leach pad.

The estimates of recoverable gold on the leach pads are calculated from the quantities of material placed on the leach pads (measured tons added to the leach pads), the grade of material placed on the leach pads (based on assay data) and a recovery percentage.

Although the quantities of recoverable gold placed on the leach pads are reconciled by comparing the quantities and grades of material placed on leach pads to the quantities and grades quantities of gold actually recovered (metallurgical balancing), the nature of the leaching process inherently limits the ability to precisely monitor inventory levels. As a result, the metallurgical balancing process is constantly monitored and estimates are refined based on actual results over time. Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis.

In-process Inventories

In-process inventories represent mineralized materials that are currently in the process of being converted to a saleable product through the absorption, desorption, recovery (ADR) process. The value of in-process material is measured based on assays of the material fed into the process and the projected recoveries of material. In-process inventories are valued at the average cost of the material fed into the process attributable to the source material coming from the mines, stockpiles and/or leach pads plus the in-process conversion costs, including applicable depreciation relating to the process facilities incurred to that point in the process.

Finished Goods Inventories

Finished goods inventories include gold that has been processed through the Company’s ADR facility and are valued at the average cost of their production.

Exploration and Development Costs -

Costs of acquiring mining properties and any exploration and development costs are expensed as incurred unless proven and probable reserves exist and the property is a commercially mineable property in accordance with FASB ASC 930,

Extractive Activities- Mining

. Mine development costs incurred either to develop new gold and silver deposits, expand the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment. The Company evaluates, at least quarterly, the carrying value of capitalized mining costs and related property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.

The Company capitalizes costs for mining properties by individual property and defers such costs for later amortization only if the prospects for economic productions are reasonably certain.

Capitalized costs are expensed in the period when the determination has been made that economic production does not appear reasonably certain.

Mineral Rights and Properties -

We defer acquisition costs until we determine the viability of the property. Since we do not have proven and probable reserves as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7, exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred. We expense care and maintenance costs as incurred.

We review the carrying value of our mineral rights and properties for impairment whenever there are negative indicators of impairment. Our estimate of the gold price, mineralized materials, operating capital, and reclamation costs are subject to risks and uncertainties affecting the recoverability of our investment in the mineral claims and properties. Although we have made our best, most current estimate of these factors, it is possible that near term changes could adversely affect estimated net cash flows from our mineral claims and properties and possibly require future asset impairment write-downs.

Where estimates of future net operating cash flows are not available and where other conditions suggest impairment, we assess recoverability of carrying value from other means, including net cash flows generated by the sale of the asset. We use the units-of-production method to deplete the mineral rights and properties.

Fair Value Measurements -

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. The fair value should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk, including the party’s own credit risk.

Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.

To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed and is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The carrying value of the Company’s cash, accounts payable, short-term borrowings (including convertible notes payable), and other current assets and liabilities approximate fair value because of their short-term maturity.

The Company recognizes its derivative liabilities as level 3 and values its derivatives using the methods discussed below. While the Company believes that its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, it recognizes that the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. The primary assumptions that would significantly affect the fair values using the methods discussed below are that of volatility and market price of the underlying common stock of the Company.

Long-Lived Assets -

We review the carrying amount of our long-lived assets for impairment whenever there are negative indicators of impairment. An asset is considered impaired when estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In the event the carrying amount of such asset is not considered recoverable, the asset is adjusted to its fair value. Fair value is generally determined based on discounted future cash flows. 

Properties, Plant and Equipment -

We record properties, plant and equipment at historical cost. We provide depreciation and amortization in amounts sufficient to match the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives or productive value. We capitalize expenditures for improvements that significantly extend the useful life of an asset. We charge expenditures for maintenance and repairs to operations when incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives as follows:

Building

7 to 15 years

Vehicles and equipment

3 to 7 years

Processing and laboratory

5 to 15 years

Furniture and fixtures

2 to 3 years

Reclamation Liabilities and Asset Retirement Obligations -

Minimum standards for site reclamation and closure have been established for us by various government agencies. Asset retirement obligations are recognized when incurred and recorded as liabilities at fair value. The liability is accreted over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, the asset retirement cost is capitalized and amortized over the life of the related asset. Reclamation costs are periodically adjusted to reflect changes in the estimated present value resulting from the passage of time and revisions to the estimates of either the timing or amount of the reclamation and abandonment costs. The Company reviews, on an annual basis, unless otherwise deemed necessary, the asset retirement obligation at each mine site.

Revenue Recognition -

Revenue is recognized from sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is determinable, the product has been delivered, the title has been transferred to the customer and collection of the sales price is reasonably assured. Gold revenue is recorded at an agreed upon spot price and gold ounce measurement resulting in revenue and a receivable at the time of sale. Gold revenue is recorded net of refining charges and discounts. Sales of by-products (such as silver) are credited to costs applicable to mining revenue.

All accounts receivable amounts are due from a single customer. Substantially all mining revenues recorded in the current period also related to the same customer. As gold can be sold through numerous gold market traders worldwide, the Company is not economically dependent on a limited number of customers for the sale of its product.

Stock Issued For Goods and Services -

Common and preferred shares issued for goods and services are valued based upon the fair market value of our common stock or the goods and services received, whichever is the most reliably measurable on the date of issue.

Stock-Based Compensation -

For stock-based transactions, compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period, based on the estimated fair value on the grant date of the award.

Loss per Common Share -

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss, less the preferred stock dividends, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Dilutive loss per share includes any additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as stock options and warrants, and convertible instruments, if the impact is not antidilutive. Since the Company incurred net losses for the periods presented, all equity-linked instruments are considered anti-dilutive.

Comprehensive Loss -

Comprehensive loss is made up of the exchange differences arising on translating foreign operations and the net loss for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Derivative Liabilities -

Derivatives liabilities are recorded at fair value when issued and the subsequent change in fair value each period is recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. We do not hold or issue any derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.

Income Taxes -

The Company’s income tax expense and deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect management’s best assessment of estimated future taxes to be paid. Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining the consolidated income tax expense.

Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of revenue and expense. In evaluating the Company’s ability to recover its deferred tax assets, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In projecting future taxable income, the Company develops assumptions including the amount of future state and federal pretax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income, and are consistent with the plans and estimates that the Company is using to manage the underlying businesses. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which the Company does not consider realization of such deferred tax assets to be more likely than not.

Changes in tax laws and rates could also affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Management is not aware of any such changes that would have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Business Segments

– The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

Use of Estimates –

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenditures during the reported periods. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Estimates may include those pertaining to valuation of inventories and mineralized material on leach pads, the estimated useful lives and valuation of properties, plant and equipment, mineral rights and properties, deferred tax assets, convertible preferred stock, derivative assets and liabilities, reclamation liabilities, stock-based compensation and payments, and contingent liabilities.

Non-Controlling Interest Policy

– Non-controlling interest (NCI) is the portion of equity ownership in a subsidiary not attributable to the parent company, who has a controlling interest and consolidates the subsidiary's financial results with its own.The amount of equity relating to the non-controlling interest is separately identified in the equity section of the balance sheet and the amount of the net income (loss) relating to the non-controlling interest is separately identified on the statement of operations.

Reclassifications -

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For recent accounting pronouncements, please refer to the notes to the financial statements section of this Annual Report.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are not required to provide disclosure under this item because we are a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The financial statements of the Company required by Article 8 of Regulation S-X are attached to this report, beginning at page F-1.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

On March 2, 2015, the Company opted to change accounting firms for purposes of independent auditing, and subsequently released Fiondella Milone & LaSaracina LLP (Fiondella) as its independent registered accounting firm. Our Board of Directors participated in and approved the decision to change independent accountants. Fiondella was initially engaged by the company on May 31, 2013 for the year ended July 31, 2013.

Fiondella’s report on the financial statements for the year ended July 31, 2014 contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to scope or accounting, except that the report contained an explanatory paragraph stating that there was substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Through the period covered by the financial review of financial statements of the quarterly period ended January 31, 2015, there were no disagreements with Fiondella on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Fiondella, would have caused them to make reference thereto in their report on the financial statements. Also, through the interim period through March 2, 2015 (the date of release of the former accountant), there have been no disagreements with Fiondella on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of Fiondella would have caused then to make reference thereto in their report on the financial statements.

During the interim period through March 2, 2015, there were no reportable events with us as set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K.

The Company originally reported this change in accountant to the SEC on Form 8-K on March 3, 2015, and provided a copy of these disclosures to Fiondella prior to that date. Fiondella subsequently furnished a letter addressed to the SEC stating that it agreed with the statements of that report.

On February 11, 2015, the Company engaged Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC of Salt Lake City, Utah, as its new independent registered public accountant. During the year ended July 31, 2014, and prior to February 11, 2015 (the date of the new engagement), we did not consult with Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, (ii) the type of audit that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements by Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC, in either case where written or oral advice provided by Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC would be an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issues or (iii) any other matter that was the subject of a disagreement between us and our former auditor or was a reportable event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) or Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, respectively).

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or 1934 Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer (principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) under the 1934 Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, because of the Company’s limited resources and limited number of employees, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2015.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements of the Company in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

With the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2015 based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on our evaluation and the material weaknesses described below, management concluded that the Company’s internal controls were not effective based on financial reporting as of July 31, 2015 based on the COSO framework criteria. Management has identified control deficiencies regarding the lack of segregation of duties, tax compliance issues and the need for a stronger internal control environment. Management of the Company believes that these material weaknesses are due to the small size of the Company’s accounting staff and reliance on outside consultants for external reporting. The small size of the Company’s accounting staff may prevent adequate controls in the future, such as segregation of duties, due to the cost/benefit of such remediation.

To mitigate the current limited resources and limited employees, we rely heavily on direct management oversight of transactions, along with the use of legal and outside accounting consultants. As we grow, we expect to increase our number of employees, which will enable us to implement adequate segregation of duties within the internal control framework.

These control deficiencies could result in a misstatement of account balances that would result in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Accordingly, we have determined that these control deficiencies as described above together constitute a material weakness.

In light of this material weakness, we performed additional analyses and procedures in order to conclude that our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K were fairly stated in accordance with US GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that despite our material weaknesses, our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 are fairly stated, in all material respects, in accordance with US GAAP.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Changes in Internal Controls

During the year ended December 31, 2015, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

Our Bylaws state that our authorized number of directors shall be one or more and shall be set by resolution of our Board of Directors. We currently have five directors.

Our current directors and officers are as follows:

Position

Michael Ahlin

Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Director

Trent D’Ambrosio

Chief Financial Officer and Director

Whit Cluff

Reed Benson

Kay Briggs

Our directors will serve in that capacity until our next annual shareholder meeting or until a successor is elected and qualified. Officers hold their positions at the will of our Board of Directors. There are no arrangements, agreements or understandings between non-management security holders and management under which non-management security holders may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our affairs.

Michael Ahlin, Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Mr. Ahlin is a seasoned executive with several decades of experience who has founded numerous startups and has held executive management positions in public and private companies in various industries. From 1985 through the present, Mr. Ahlin has served as the founder and President of WetCor, Inc., a multi-disciplined Engineering Construction Firm licensed in numerous states and performing both bid and design/build projects including minerals processing, mining, water treatment, energy, Medical (5 MRE centers), geothermal power, and renewable energy and commercial buildings. In addition, from 2004 through the present, Mr. Ahlin has served as a Managing Partner of Cactus Management Services LLC. Mr. Ahlin has served as the Company’s CEO since inception. Mr. Ahlin was appointed as CEO, President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director of the Company on February 25, 2013. Mr. Ahlin received a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Utah in 1971 and 1977, respectively.

Trent D’Ambrosio, Chief Financial Officer and Director

Mr. D’Ambrosio has been a Director of Inception Mining Inc. since February 28, 2013. From October 2011 through the March 2013, Mr. D’Ambrosio has held the positions of Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Inception Holdings LLC, a resource exploration company, and is the responsible for the overall strategic direction for the organization. His professional record includes 25 years of management and financial services experience with companies ranging from Fortune 500 companies to start ups.

Whit Cluff, Director

Mr. Cluff has over 35 years of experience in the commercial real estate industry. Mr. Cluff has been involved in all disciplines of real estate land development, mixed-use development, retail tenant representation, developer representation, industrial property procurement and asset management. Mr. Cluff has an extensive background in public and private businesses giving him strong analytical, planning, and organization ability with effective negotiation skills. From 2003 through the present, Mr. Cluff has served as Vice President and Associate Broker at Coldwell Banker Commercial, NRT in Salt Lake City, Utah. Mr. Cluff attended the University of Utah and served in the United States Army.

Reed Benson, Director

Mr. Benson has been a director from October 2, 2015 to the present. From September, 2008, to the present, in addition to the private practice of law, he is a founder and partner of Legends Capital Group, LLC, a privately held venture capital group that identifies investment opportunities in natural resources, bio tech and technology fields. From October 2004 to September 2008 he was employed as Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and General Counsel and member of Board of Directors of Broadcast International, Inc., a publicly traded communications services company. From 2001 to October 2004, he was in the private practice of law where his practice focused on tax and business related matters. From July 1995 to January 2001 he was secretary and general counsel for Data Broadcasting Corporation, a provider of market information to individual investors. Mr. Benson received J.D. degree from the University of Utah School of Law in 1976 and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting from the University of Utah in 1971. Mr. Benson became a Certified Public Accountant in 1974. Mr. Benson’s experience in finance, accounting and business consulting, together with his prior public company directorship, provide Mr. Benson with expertise enabling critical input to our Board decision-making process.

Kay Briggs, Director

Mr. Briggs has BS degrees in economics and political science from Brigham Young University, magna cum laude. To launch his career, he completed internships with CitiBank in New York and Argentina. He then went on to obtain an MBA with an emphasis in international business and finance, also from Brigham Young University. He then pursued post-graduate work with IBM and Stanford University. Mr. Briggs spent nearly ten years with EXXON (Esso International) with managerial opportunities in information systems; refinery maintenance (with additional training in product blending chemistry); maritime contract negotiating; supply and transportation managing in Toronto, Canada with Imperial Oil; and an executive position with Tar Sands and Heavy Oil Extraction and Refining in Calgary, Canada. Mr. Briggs spent the next 32 years with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as managing director of materials management and international operations, and director of business affairs in Argentina, Southeast US, and 32 island nations in the Caribbean. He has experience with numerous civic assignments, including school boards, city council, and as mayor of North Salt Lake, Utah. Additionally, he has served in various board of directors positions with several organizations.

Other Directorships

Other than as set forth above, none of our directors hold any other directorships in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Board of Directors and Director Nominees

Since our Board of Directors does not include a majority of independent directors, the decisions of the Board regarding director nominees are made by persons who have an interest in the outcome of the determination. The Board will consider candidates for directors proposed by security holders, although no formal procedures for submitting candidates have been adopted. Unless otherwise determined, at any time not less than 90 days prior to the next annual Board meeting at which a slate of director nominees is adopted, the Board will accept written submissions from proposed nominees that include the name, address and telephone number of the proposed nominee; a brief statement of the nominee’s qualifications to serve as a director; and a statement as to why the security holder submitting the proposed nominee believes that the nomination would be in the best interests of our security holders. If the proposed nominee is not the same person as the security holder submitting the name of the nominee, a letter from the nominee agreeing to the submission of his or her name for consideration should be provided at the time of submission. The letter should be accompanied by a résumé supporting the nominee’s qualifications to serve on the Board, as well as a list of references.

The Board identifies director nominees through a combination of referrals from different people, including management, existing Board members and security holders. Once a candidate has been identified, the Board reviews the individual’s experience and background and may discuss the proposed nominee with the source of the recommendation. If the Board believes it to be appropriate, Board members may meet with the proposed nominee before making a final determination whether to include the proposed nominee as a member of the slate of director nominees submitted to security holders for election to the Board.

Some of the factors, which the Board considers when evaluating proposed nominees, include their knowledge of and experience in business matters, finance, capital markets and mergers and acquisitions. The Board may request additional information from each candidate prior to reaching a determination, and it is under no obligation to formally respond to all recommendations, although as a matter of practice, it will endeavor to do so.

Conflicts of Interest

Our directors are not obligated to commit their full time and attention to our business and, accordingly, they may encounter a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our operations and those of other businesses. In the course of their other business activities, they may become aware of investment and business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as other entities to which they owe a fiduciary duty. As a result, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. They may also in the future become affiliated with entities that are engaged in business activities similar to those we intend to conduct.

In general, officers and directors of a corporation are required to present business opportunities to the corporation if:

the corporation could financially undertake the opportunity;

the opportunity is within the corporation’s line of business; and

it would be unfair to the corporation and its stockholders not to bring the opportunity to the attention of the corporation.

We plan to adopt a code of ethics that obligates our directors, officers and employees to disclose potential conflicts of interest and prohibits those persons from engaging in such transactions without our consent.

Significant Employees

Other than as described above, we do not expect any other individuals to make a significant contribution to our business.

Legal Proceedings

None of our directors, executive officers or control persons has been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:

any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, where the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

No Audit Committee or Financial Expert

The Company does not have an audit committee or a financial expert serving on the Board of Directors. The Company plans to form and implement an audit committee as soon as practicable.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our officers, directors, or persons nominated for such positions.

Due to our recent change in business strategy and objectives and our small size and limited resources, we have not yet adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer and principal accounting officer, but intend to do so this year.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, all executive officers, directors, and each person who is the beneficial owner of more than 10% of the common stock of a company that files reports pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act of 1934, are required to report the ownership of such common stock, options, and stock appreciation rights (other than certain cash only rights) and any changes in that ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has evaluated all relevant Section 16(a) filings and has determined that the company is compliant with this section to the best of its knowledge.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Our Board of Directors has not established a separate compensation committee. Instead, the Board of Directors reviews and approves executive compensation policies and practices, reviews salaries and bonuses for our officer(s), decides on benefit plans, and considers other matters as may, from time to time, be referred to it. We do not currently have a Compensation Committee Charter. Our Board continues to emphasize the important link between our performance, which ultimately benefits all shareholders, and the compensation of our executives. Therefore, the primary goal of our executive compensation policy is to closely align the interests of the shareholders with the interests of the executive officer(s). In order to achieve this goal, we attempt to (i) offer compensation opportunities that attract and retain executives whose abilities and skills are critical to our long-term success and reward them for their efforts in ensuring our success and (ii) encourage executives to manage from the perspective of owners with an equity stake in us.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position

Salary

Bonus

Stock Awards

Option Awards

Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

All Other Compensation ($)

Total

Michael Ahlin, Chief

25,000

Executive Officer, President, Secretary, and Director

Trent D’Ambrosio,

Whit Cluff,

Reed Benson,

Kay Briggs,

Option Grants

As of December 31, 2015, we had not granted any options or stock appreciation rights to our named executive officers or directors.

Management Agreements

On August 1, 2015, the Company amended the previously entered into employment agreement with Michael Ahlin pursuant to which the eligibility requirements of the Company achieving positive EBITDA in two consecutive quarters as reflected in its filings with the SEC were removed.

Compensation of Directors

As of the Closing of the Clavo Rico Merger Agreement on October 2, 2015, Reed Benson and Kay Briggs were elected as members of the Board of Directors of the Company.

Our directors did not receive any compensation for their services as directors from our inception through December 31, 2015. We have no formal plan for compensating our directors for their services in the future in their capacity as directors, although such directors are expected in the future to receive options to purchase shares of our common stock as awarded by our Board of Directors or by any compensation committee that may be established.

Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits to our directors or executive officers. We have no material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of the Board of Directors or a committee thereof.

Compensation Committee

We do not currently have a compensation committee of the Board of Directors or a committee performing similar functions. The Board of Directors as a whole participates in the consideration of executive officer and director compensation.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following tables set forth the ownership, as of April 21, 2016, of our common stock by each of our directors, by all of our executive officers and directors as a group, and by each person known to us who is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our securities. As of April 21, 2016, there were 264,750,145 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. All persons named have sole or shared voting and investment control with respect to the shares, except as otherwise noted. The number of shares described below includes shares which the beneficial owner described has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of this Form 10-K.

Title of Class

Name and Address of

Amount and

Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

Percent of Class

Legends Capital Group, LLC (1)

64,346,250

4049 S. Highland Drive

Salt Lake City, Utah 84124

Madison, LLC (2)

13,727,200

All 5% beneficial owners as a group

78,073,450

Legends Capital Group, LLC is beneficially controlled by Jason Briggs, the nephew of Kay Briggs, a director. Reed Benson, a director of the Company, owns an 11% equity interest in Legends Capital Group, LLC.

Madison, LLC is beneficially controlled by Jason Briggs, the nephew of Kay Briggs.

Michael Ahlin (1)

c/o Inception Mining, Inc.

5330 South 900 East, Suite 280

Murray, UT 84107

Trent D’Ambrosio (1)

Whit Cluff (1)

Reed Benson (1)

 5,147,700 (2)

Kay Briggs (1)

1,715,900

All Officers and Directors as a Group

14,844,529

Executive officer and/or director of the Company.

These shares are held by Moreland Family, LLC, whose majority member is Jeanne Benson, Mr. Benson’s wife.

Changes in Control

As a result of the Clavo Rico Merger Agreement described herein, a change in control of the Company occurred.

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

As of December 31, 2015, we have one equity compensation plan: the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Related Party Transactions

The Company leases office space from a related affiliate, MDL Ventures, LLC, which includes month to month terms. The Company has received cash advances of $19,909 from related parties during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015. At the Closing of the Merger on October 2, 2015, the Company assumed certain debts in Clavo Rico Ltd. that were owed to related parties as described below:

12/31/2015

Claymore Management convertible note payable

185,000

GAIA Ltd convertible note payable

1,150,000

Legends Capital convertible note payable

765,000

LWB Irrev Trust convertible note payable

1,101,000

Silverbrook Corporation convertible note payable

2,227,980

MDL Ventures convertible note payable

774,635

Total convertible notes payable

6,203,615

Less unamortized discount

(4,357,470

Total convertible notes payable, net of unamortized debt discount

The total amount of these convertible notes is $6,203,615. All of the related party transactions are further described in the notes to the Financial Statements filed with this Annual Report.

Director Independence

Our securities are quoted on the OTC Markets, which does not have any director independence requirements. Once we engage further directors and officers, we plan to develop a definition of independence and scrutinize our Board of Directors with regard to this definition.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees.

The aggregate fees paid for the annual audit of financial statements included in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2015, and the review of our quarterly reports for such years amounted to $59,315. The aggregate fees paid for the annual audit of financial statements included in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2014, and the review of our quarterly reports for such year, amounted to $0.

Audit Related Fees.

For the year ended December 31, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, there were no fees billed for other audit related fees.

Tax Fees.

For the year ended December 31, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, we paid $0 and $0, respectively, for tax fees.

All Other Fees.

For the year ended December 31, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, there were no fees billed for services other than services described above.

Our Board of Directors serves as the Audit Committee and has unanimously approved all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. The independent accountants and management are required to periodically report to the Board of Directors regarding the extent of services provided by the independent accountants, and the fees for the services performed to date.

There have been no non-audit services provided by our independent accountant for the year ended December 31, 2015 or the year ended December 31, 2014.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1)(2) Financial Statements: See index to financial statements and supporting schedules.

(a)(3) Exhibits.

Exhibit No.

Articles of Incorporation (1)

Certificate of Amendment, effective March 5, 2010(2)

Certificate of Amendment, effective June 23, 2010(3)

Articles of Merger, effective May 17, 2013 (4)

Bylaws (1)

Form of Subscription Agreement entered by and between Inception Mining Inc. and Accredited Investors (5)

Letter Amendment dated November 1, 2013 to Promissory Note dated January 17, 2013 between Inception Resources, LLC and U.P and Burlington Development, LLC (8)

Note Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and the Iconic Holdings, LLC, dated February 18, 2014 (9)

Convertible Promissory Note issued to Iconic Holdings, LLC (9)

Securities Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and Typenex Co-Investment, LLC, dated September 24, 2014 (10)

Convertible Promissory Note issued to Typenex Co-Investment, LLC (10)

Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock issued to Typenex Co-Investment, LLC (10)

Convertible Promissory Note issued to Claymore Management dated October 2, 2015 (12)

Convertible Promissory Note issued to GAIA, Ltd. dated October 2, 2015 (12)

Convertible Promissory Note issued to Legends Capital Group dated October 2, 2015 (12)

Convertible Promissory Note issued to LWB Irrevocable Trust dated October 2, 2015 (12)

Convertible Promissory Note issued to Silverbrook Corporation dated October 2, 2015 (12)

Amendment to Convertible Promissory Note issued to MDL Ventures dated January 1, 2016 (12)

Asset Purchase Agreement dated February 25, 2013, by and between Gold American, its majority shareholder Brett Bertolami, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Inception Development Inc. on one hand, and Inception Resources, LLC on the other hand (6)

Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Michael Ahlin dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Whit Cluff dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Brian Brewer dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Consulting Agreement by and between the Company and Jeff Pike dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Consulting Agreement by and between the Company and First Trust Management Inc. dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Consulting Agreement by and between the Company and Danzig Ltd. dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Consulting Agreement by and between the Company and BKBK Holding LLC dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Consulting Agreement by and between the Company and Highland Ventures LLC dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Consulting Agreement by and between the Company and Monte Carlo LLC dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Consulting Agreement by and between the Company and Powder Moon Corporation dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Consulting Agreement by and between the Company and Lee Kimball dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Consulting Agreement by and between the Company and Mitch Cohen dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Debt Exchange Agreement by and between Gold American Mining Corp. and Brett Bertolami dated February 25, 2013 (6)

Agreement by and between Crawford Cattle Company LLC, as seller, and, Inception Mining Inc., as Buyer dated as of August 30, 2013 (7)

Employment Agreement with Michael Ahlin dated August 1, 2015 (11)

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated August 4, 2015 (11)

Addendum to Agreement and Plan of Merger (11)

List of Subsidiaries (12)

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 *

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 *

Certification of Chief Financial Officers pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Filed herewith.

Incorporated by reference from Form SB-2 filed with the SEC on October 31, 2007.

Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2010.

Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 28, 2010.

Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 20, 2013.

Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 5, 2013.

Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2013.

Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 6, 2013.

Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on June 20, 2014.

Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 12, 2014.

Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 7, 2014.

Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 7, 2015.

Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 3, 2016.

Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

INCEPTION MINING, INC.

Date: November 22, 2016

/s/ Michael Ahlin

Title:

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Trent D’Ambrosio

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ Whit Cluff

REPORTS OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015 (RESTATED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2014

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 (RESTATED) AND 2014

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT  AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015 (RESTATED) AND 2014

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 (RESTATED) AND 2014

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Inception Mining, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Inception Mining, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Inception Mining, Inc. as of December 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred net losses and has accumulated a significant deficit. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As mentioned in Note 18, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been restated for the correction of errors.

/s/ Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC

Salt Lake City, UT

May 3, 2016, except for Notes 2, 4, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 18 as to which the date is November 21, 2016

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Board of Directors of

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Inception Mining, Inc. as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss, and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management is also responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

PBX (504) 2270 – 7364 al 7366

E-mail

tovarlopez@pkfhonduras.com

pkfhonduras@yahoo.com

www.pkfhonduras.com

, P.O. Box 30209 | Edificio Metrópolis, Torre II, Nivel 24

Con oficinas en: Tegucigalpa, San Pedro Sula, La Ceiba | Honduras, C.A.

PKF-Tovar López is a member firm of PKF International Limited.

PKF International Limited is a network of legally independent member firms with representation in 125 countries.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion, except for the effects of such adjustments, the consolidated financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the combined financial position of Inception Mining, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Tegucigalpa, Honduras

April 30, 2015

Consolidated Balance Sheets

ASSETS

Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

159,678

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable - related parties

24,622

969,986

1,703,882

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

18,057

62,065

Total Current Assets

1,955,497

Property, plant and equipment, net

1,759,673

2,289,730

Mining rights and concessions

216,126

Other assets

24,769

25,242

Total Assets

2,925,219

4,486,595

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Current Liabilities

Accounts payable

309,085

338,219

Accrued liabilities

4,883,693

1,018,789

Advances due to related parties

728,543

Notes payable

70,000

Convertible notes payable, net of debt discount of $127,947 and $0 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively

60,000

Convertible note payable - related party, net of debt discount of $4,357,470 and $0 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively

5,228,980

Derivative liability

Total Current Liabilities

Long-term convertible notes payable, net of debt discount of $53,345 and $0 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively

Mine reclamation obligation

77,716

29,637

Total Liabilities

6,675,625

Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 8)

Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Preferred stock, $0.00001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding

Common stock, $0.00001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 255,350,251 and 240,225,901 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively

Additional paid-in capital

(1,446,169

1,047,465

(3,191,220

Accumulated comprehensive loss

(235,492

(42,821

Total Controlling Interest

(2,184,174

Non-Controlling Interest

(8,150

(4,856

Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

(2,189,030

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

For the Year Ended

Precious Metals Income

Operating Expenses

Cost of sales

General and administrative

Depreciation and amortization expense

Total Operating Expenses

Loss from Operations

Other Income/(Expenses)

Other income (expense)

Change in derivative liability

Loss on extinguishment of debt

Loss on impairment of mining claim

Interest expense

Total Other Income/(Expenses)

(20,193

Loss from Operations before Income Taxes

Provision for Income Taxes

NET LOSS

NET LOSS - Non-Controlling Interest

NET LOSS - Controlling Interest

(178,907

Net loss per share - Basic and Diluted

Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period - Basic and Diluted

243,944,759

Other Comprehensive Loss

Exchange differences arising on translating foreign operations

(192,671

(601,115

Total Comprehensive Loss

(783,392

Total Comprehensive Loss - Non-Controlling Interest

Total Comprehensive Loss - Controlling Interest

(779,479

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit

Common stock

($0.00001Par)

Paid-in

Deficiency

Balance, December 31, 2013

558,295

(3,012,313

(1,486

(1,405,637

Foreign currency translation adjustment

(601,116

Net loss for the year

(3,370

Balance, December 31, 2014

Recapitalization

14,757,683

(2,572,630

(2,572,482

Shares issued for debt settlement

29,999

30,000

Shares issued for cash

48,995

Share cancellation

(233,333

- Restated

(3,294

Balance, December 31, 2015 - Restated

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:

Net Loss

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations

Depreciation expense

362,172

Impairment of mining concessions

Amortization of debt discount

1,135,132

Initial value of derivative liabilities

23,195,355

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Decr (incr) in trade receivables

(3,139

(3,505

Decr (incr) in other receivables - related parties

17,916

Decr (incr) inventories

733,896

(52,457

Decr (incr) prepaid expenses and other current assets

613,064

30,843

Incr (decr) accounts payable

(29,134

173,701

Incr (decr) accrued liabilities

3,864,904

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

Advance receivable, related party

(431,507

(106,617

Purchase of fixed assets

53,532

(585,528

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

Repayment of note payable

(305,000

Repayment of convertible notes payable

(134,450

Proceeds from notes payable

Proceeds from notes payable-related party

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash

Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash

Cash at Beginning of Period

178,968

39,833

Cash at End of Period

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid for interest

84,102

Cash paid for taxes

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014

1. Nature of Business

Inception Mining, Inc. (formerly known as Gold American Mining Corp.) was incorporated under the name of Golf Alliance Corporation and under the laws of the State of Nevada on July 2, 2007. Inception Mining, Inc. is a precious metal mineral acquisition, exploration and development company. Inception Development, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary was incorporated under the laws of the State of Idaho on January 28, 2013.

Golf Alliance Corporation pursued its original business plan to provide opportunities for golfers to play on private golf courses normally closed to them due to the membership requirements of the private clubs. During the year ended July 31, 2010, the Company decided to redirect its business focus toward precious metal mineral acquisition and exploration.

On March 5, 2010, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to (1) to change its name to Silver America, Inc. and (2) increased its authorized common stock from 100,000,000 to 500,000,000.

On June 23, 2010 the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to Gold American Mining Corp.

On November 21, 2012, the Company implemented a 200 to 1 reverse stock split. Upon effectiveness of the stock split, each shareholder canceled 200 shares of common stock for every share of common stock owned as of November 21, 2012. This reverse stock split was effective on February 13, 2013. All share and per share references have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this 200 to 1 reverse stock split in the financial statements and in the notes to financial statements for all periods presented, to reflect the stock split as if it occurred on the first day of the first period presented.

On February 25, 2013, Gold American Mining Corp. and its majority shareholder (the “Majority Shareholder”), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Inception Development Inc. (the “Subsidiary”), entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Inception Resources, LLC, a Utah corporation (“Inception Resources”), pursuant to which Inception purchased the U.P. and Burlington Gold Mine in consideration of 16,000,000 shares of common stock of Inception, the assumption of promissory notes in the amount of $950,000 and the assignment of a 3% net royalty. Inception Resources was an entity owned by and under the control of the majority shareholder. This transaction is deemed an asset purchase by entities under common control. The Asset Purchase Agreement closed on February 25, 2013 (the “Closing”). Inception was a “shell company” (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) immediately prior to our acquisition of the gold mine pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement. As a result of such acquisition, the Company’s operations are now focused on the ownership and operation of the mine acquired from Inception Resources. Consequently, the Company believes that acquisition has caused us to cease to be a shell company as it no longer has nominal operations.

On May 17, 2013, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to Inception Mining, Inc. (“Inception” or the “Company”).

On October 2, 2015, the Company consummated a merger with Clavo Rico Ltd. (“Clavo Rico”). Clavo Rico is a privately held Turks and Caicos company with principal operations in Honduras, Central America. Clavo Rico operates the Clavo Rico mining concession through its subsidiaries Compañía Minera Cerros del Sur, S.A de C.V. and Compañía Minera Clavo Rico, S.A. de C.V. and holds other mining concessions. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company issued of 240,225,901 shares of common stock of Inception and assumed promissory notes in the amount of $5,488,980 and accrued interest of $3,434,426. Under this merger agreement, there was a change in control and it has been treated for accounting purposes as a reverse recapitalization with Clavo Rico, Ltd. being the surviving entity. Its workings include several historical underground operations dating back to the early Mayan and Spanish occupation.

a Minera Cerros del Sur, S.A. de C.V. as a small family business. In 2003, Clavo Rico’s predecessor purchased a 20% interest and later increased its ownership to 99.9%.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Going Concern -

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements during year ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred net losses of $27,165,344 and provided $34,933 in cash for operating activities. These factors among others indicate that the Company may be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

The Company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations and to obtain additional funding sources. There can be no assurance that the Company’s financing efforts will result in profitable operations or the resolution of the Company’s liquidity problems. The accompanying statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management is currently working to make changes that will result in profitable operations and to obtain additional funding sources to meet the Company’s need for cash during the next twelve months and beyond. 

Principles of Consolidation -

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Inception Mining, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Inception Development, Corp., Clavo Rico Development Corp., Clavo Rico, Ltd. and Compa

Basis of Presentation -

The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Cash and Cash Equivalents -

The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Inventories, Stockpiles and Mineralized Material on Leach Pads -

Inventories, including stockpiles and mineralized material on leach pads are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value represents the estimated future sales price of the product based on current and long-term metals prices, less the estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale. Write-downs of stockpiles, mineralized material on leach pads and inventories to net realizable value are reported as a component of costs applicable to mining revenue. Cost is comprised of production costs for mineralized material produced and processed. Production costs include the costs of materials, costs of processing, direct labor, mine site and processing facility overhead costs, stock-based compensation, and depreciation, amortization and depletion.

Stockpiles

Stockpiles represent mineralized material that has been extracted from the mine and is available for further processing. Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of tons added and removed from the stockpile. Stockpile tonnages are verified by periodic surveys. Costs are allocated to stockpiles based on relative values of material stockpiled and processed using current mining costs incurred up to the point of stockpiling the material, including applicable overhead, depreciation, and depletion relating to mining operations, and removed at each stockpile’s average cost per ton.

The Company utilizes a heap leaching process to recover gold from its mineralized material. Under this method, the mineralized material is placed on leach pads where it is treated with a chemical solution that dissolves the gold contained in the material. The resulting gold-bearing solution is further processed in a facility where the gold is recovered. Costs are added to mineralized material on leach pads based on current mining and processing costs, including applicable depreciation relating to mining and processing operations. Costs are transferred from mineralized material on leach pads to subsequent stages of in-process inventories as the gold-bearing solution is processed. The value of such transferred costs of mineralized material on leach pads is based on the average cost per estimated recoverable ounce of gold on the leach pad.

The estimates of recoverable gold on the leach pads are calculated from the quantities of material placed on the leach pads (measured tons added to the leach pads), the grade of material placed on the leach pads (based on assay data) and a recovery percentage.

Although the quantities of recoverable gold placed on the leach pads are reconciled by comparing the quantities and grades of material placed on leach pads to the quantities and grades quantities of gold actually recovered (metallurgical balancing), the nature of the leaching process inherently limits the ability to precisely monitor inventory levels. As a result, the metallurgical balancing process is constantly monitored and estimates are refined based on actual results over time. Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis.

In-process Inventories

In-process inventories represent mineralized materials that are currently in the process of being converted to a saleable product through the absorption, desorption, recovery (ADR) process. The value of in-process material is measured based on assays of the material fed into the process and the projected recoveries of material. In-process inventories are valued at the average cost of the material fed into the process attributable to the source material coming from the mines, stockpiles and/or leach pads plus the in-process conversion costs, including applicable depreciation relating to the process facilities incurred to that point in the process.

Finished Goods Inventories

Finished goods inventories include gold that has been processed through the Company’s ADR facility and are valued at the average cost of their production.

Exploration and Development Costs -

Costs of acquiring mining properties and any exploration and development costs are expensed as incurred unless proven and probable reserves exist and the property is a commercially mineable property in accordance with FASB ASC 930,

. Mine development costs incurred either to develop new gold and silver deposits, expand the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment. The Company evaluates, at least quarterly, the carrying value of capitalized mining costs and related property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.

The Company capitalizes costs for mining properties by individual property and defers such costs for later amortization only if the prospects for economic productions are reasonably certain.

Capitalized costs are expensed in the period when the determination has been made that economic production does not appear reasonably certain.

Mineral Rights and Properties -

We defer acquisition costs until we determine the viability of the property. Since we do not have proven and probable reserves as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7, exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred. We expense care and maintenance costs as incurred.

We review the carrying value of our mineral rights and properties for impairment whenever there are negative indicators of impairment. Our estimate of the gold price, mineralized materials, operating capital, and reclamation costs are subject to risks and uncertainties affecting the recoverability of our investment in the mineral claims and properties. Although we have made our best, most current estimate of these factors, it is possible that near term changes could adversely affect estimated net cash flows from our mineral claims and properties and possibly require future asset impairment write-downs.

Where estimates of future net operating cash flows are not available and where other conditions suggest impairment, we assess recoverability of carrying value from other means, including net cash flows generated by the sale of the asset. We use the units-of-production method to deplete the mineral rights and properties.

Fair Value Measurements -

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. The fair value should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk, including the party’s own credit risk.

Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.

To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed and is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The carrying value of the Company’s cash, accounts payable, short-term borrowings (including convertible notes payable), and other current assets and liabilities approximate fair value because of their short-term maturity.

The Company recognizes its derivative liabilities as level 3 and values its derivatives using the methods discussed below. While the Company believes that its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, it recognizes that the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. The primary assumptions that would significantly affect the fair values using the methods discussed below are that of volatility and market price of the underlying common stock of the Company.

Long-Lived Assets -

We review the carrying amount of our long-lived assets for impairment whenever there are negative indicators of impairment. An asset is considered impaired when estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In the event the carrying amount of such asset is not considered recoverable, the asset is adjusted to its fair value. Fair value is generally determined based on discounted future cash flows.

Properties, Plant and Equipment -

We record properties, plant and equipment at historical cost. We provide depreciation and amortization in amounts sufficient to match the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives or productive value. We capitalize expenditures for improvements that significantly extend the useful life of an asset. We charge expenditures for maintenance and repairs to operations when incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives as follows:

7 to 15 years

Vehicles and equipment

3 to 7 years

Processing and laboratory

5 to 15 years

Furniture and fixtures

2 to 3 years

Reclamation Liabilities and Asset Retirement Obligations -

Minimum standards for site reclamation and closure have been established for us by various government agencies. Asset retirement obligations are recognized when incurred and recorded as liabilities at fair value. The liability is accreted over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, the asset retirement cost is capitalized and amortized over the life of the related asset. Reclamation costs are periodically adjusted to reflect changes in the estimated present value resulting from the passage of time and revisions to the estimates of either the timing or amount of the reclamation and abandonment costs. The Company reviews, on an annual basis, unless otherwise deemed necessary, the asset retirement obligation at each mine site.

Revenue Recognition -

Revenue is recognized from sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is determinable, the product has been delivered, the title has been transferred to the customer and collection of the sales price is reasonably assured. Gold revenue is recorded at an agreed upon spot price and gold ounce measurement resulting in revenue and a receivable at the time of sale. Gold revenue is recorded net of refining charges and discounts. Sales of by-products (such as silver) are credited to costs applicable to mining revenue.

All accounts receivable amounts are due from a single customer. Substantially all mining revenues recorded in the current period also related to the same customer. As gold can be sold through numerous gold market traders worldwide, the Company is not economically dependent on a limited number of customers for the sale of its product.

Stock Issued For Goods and Services -

Common and preferred shares issued for goods and services are valued based upon the fair market value of our common stock or the goods and services received, whichever is the most reliably measurable on the date of issue.

Stock-Based Compensation -

For stock-based transactions, compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period, based on the estimated fair value on the grant date of the award.

Loss per Common Share -

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss, less the preferred stock dividends, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Dilutive loss per share includes any additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as stock options and warrants, and convertible instruments, if the impact is not antidilutive. Since the Company incurred net losses for the periods presented, all equity-linked instruments are considered anti-dilutive.  Accordingly, common share equivalents of 149,562,926 have been excluded from the loss per share calculation.

Comprehensive Loss -

Comprehensive loss is made up of the exchange differences arising on translating foreign operations and the net loss for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Derivative Liabilities -

Derivatives liabilities are recorded at fair value when issued and the subsequent change in fair value each period is recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. We do not hold or issue any derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.

Income Taxes -

The Company’s income tax expense and deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect management’s best assessment of estimated future taxes to be paid. Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining the consolidated income tax expense.

Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of revenue and expense. In evaluating the Company’s ability to recover its deferred tax assets, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In projecting future taxable income, the Company develops assumptions including the amount of future state and federal pretax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income, and are consistent with the plans and estimates that the Company is using to manage the underlying businesses. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which the Company does not consider realization of such deferred tax assets to be more likely than not.

Changes in tax laws and rates could also affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Management is not aware of any such changes that would have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Business Segments

– The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

Use of Estimates –

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenditures during the reported periods. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Estimates may include those pertaining to valuation of inventories and mineralized material on leach pads, the estimated useful lives and valuation of properties, plant and equipment, mineral rights and properties, deferred tax assets, convertible preferred stock, derivative assets and liabilities, reclamation liabilities, stock-based compensation and payments, and contingent liabilities.

– Non-controlling interest (NCI) is the portion of equity ownership in a subsidiary not attributable to the parent company, who has a controlling interest and consolidates the subsidiary's financial results with its own. The amount of equity relating to the non-controlling interest is separately identified in the equity section of the balance sheet and the amount of the net income (loss) relating to the non-controlling interest is separately identified on the statement of operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements –

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory”. This ASU provides that an entity that measured inventory by using first-in, first-out or average cost should measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices of such inventory in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using last-in, first-out or the retail inventory method. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within these fiscal years. Early application of this ASU is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company elected early application of this ASU, which did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15. This ASU requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the ASU (1) provides a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) requires an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) requires certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) requires an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) requires an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). This standard is effective for the fiscal years ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 that introduces a new five-step revenue recognition model in which an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also requires disclosures sufficient to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures about contracts with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which eliminates the current requirement to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent amounts in a classified statement of financial position. Instead, entities will be required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent in a statement of financial position. This standard is effective financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early application is permitted. The Company is evaluating the timing of its adoption of this ASU. The Company elected early application of this ASU, which did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications -

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.

3. Inventories, Stockpiles and Mineralized Materials on Leach Pads

Inventories, stockpiles and mineralized materials on leach pads at December 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted of the following:

Supplies

124,598

185,385

315,954

1,518,497

ADR Plant

206,105

Finished Ore

323,329

Total Inventories

There were no stockpiles at December 31, 2015 and 2014.

During 2015, the Company evaluated the mineralized material on the leach pad and determined that all ore placed on the pad prior to January 1, 2015 had dropped below the economically viable level to recover materials. It was determined that the value of this mineralized material should be written to zero. The Company recognized a write-down of this mineralized material on the leach pad in the amount of $1,518,497 from its inventory-in-process amounts.

4. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC subtopic 825-10,

(“ASC 825-10”) on January 1, 2008. ASC 825-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. ASC 825-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 825-10 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.

As of December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014, the Company did not have any items that would be classified as level 1 or 2 disclosures.

All items required to be recorded or measured on a recurring basis are based upon level 3 inputs.

The derivative liability as of December 31, 2015, in the amount of $26,934,356 has a level 3 classification.

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Debt Derivative Liabilities

Warrant Derivative Liabilities

Transfers in upon initial fair value of derivative liabilities

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities and warrant liability

Transfers to permanent equity upon conversion of note

Balance, December 31, 2014

Transfers in upon initial fair value of derivative liabilities

29,683,472

106,804

29,790,276

2,868,971

13,051

Balance, December 31, 2015

26,814,501

119,855

Net gain for the period included in earnings relating to the liabilities held at December 31, 2015

Net gain for the period included in earnings relating to the liabilities held at December 31, 2014

Debt derivatives –

As described in Note 4, the Company issued convertible promissory notes which are convertible into common stock, at holders’ option, at a discount to the market price of the Company’s common stock. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to these notes relating to certain anti-dilutive (reset) provisions. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of debenture and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date.

At December 31, 2015, the Company marked to market the fair value of the debt derivatives and determined a fair value of $26,814,501. The Company recorded a gain from change in fair value of debt derivatives of $2,868,971 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The fair value of the embedded derivatives was determined using Binomial Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 213.00% to 309.45%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.14% to 1.06% (4) expected life of 0.10 to 1.94 years, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock at each valuation date.

Based upon ASC 840-15-25 (EITF Issue 00-19, paragraph 11) the Company has adopted a sequencing approach regarding the application of ASC 815-40 to its outstanding convertible notes. Pursuant to the sequencing approach, the Company evaluates its contracts based upon earliest issuance date.

Warrant liabilities –

As described in Note 4, the Company issued warrants in conjunction with the issuance with the Typenex, JMJ Financial and Firstfire Global Convertible Promissory Notes. These warrants contain certain reset provisions. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date (issuance date) and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date.

At December 31, 2015, the Company marked to market the fair value of the warrant liability and determined a fair value of $119,855. The Company recorded a loss from change in fair value of warrant liability of $13,051 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The fair value of the warrant liability was determined using Binomial Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 339.39% to 377.99%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 1.31% to 1.76% (4) expected life of 3.75 to 4.59 years, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock at each valuation date.

Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Long-term investments

Warrant derivative liabilities

Debt derivative liabilities

5. Properties, Plant and Equipment, Net

Properties, plant and equipment at December 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted of the following:

11,562

12,022

Buildings

2,289,865

2,190,374

Mining Machinery and Equipment

964,651

1,255,574

Office Equipment and Furniture

42,289

15,880

88,160

84,910

3,396,527

3,558,760

Less Accumulated Depreciation

(1,636,854

(1,269,030

Total Property, Plant and Equipment

During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recognized depreciation expense of $328,408 and $390,528, respectively.

6. Mineral Rights and Properties

On October 2, 2015, the Company consummated a merger with Clavo Rico Ltd. Clavo Rico is a privately held Turks and Caicos company with principal operations in Honduras, Central America. Clavo Rico operates the Clavo Rico mining concession through its subsidiary, Compa

a Minera Cerros del Sur, S.A. de C.V. and holds other mining concessions. Its workings include several historical underground operations dating back to the early Mayan and Spanish occupation. The Company’s primary mine is located on the 200 hectare Clavo Rico Concession, located in southern Honduras. This mine was originally explored and exploited in the 16th century by the Spanish, and more recently has been operated by Compa

a Minera Cerros del Sur, S.A. de C.V. as a small family business. In 2003, Clavo Rico’s predecessor purchased a 20% interest and later increased its ownership to 99.9%. The Company has released its claim on some of the concessions and wrote-off the remaining balance of the mining rights for these concessions during the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company recognized an impairment of mining rights of $135,450,

Mining Rights

225,726

Accretion of Mining Rights

(9,600

(80,676

Impairment of Mining Rights

7. Mine Reclamation Liability

The Company is required to mitigate long-term environmental impacts by stabilizing, contouring, re-sloping, and re-vegetating various portions of our site after mining and mineral processing operations are completed. These reclamation efforts are conducted in accordance with plans reviewed and approved by the appropriate regulatory agencies.

The fair value of the long-term liability of $77,716 and $29,637 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for our obligation to reclaim our mine facility is based on our most recent reclamation plan, as revised, submitted and approved by the Honduran Institute of Geology and Mines (INHGEOMIN) and Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (SERNA). Such costs are based on management’s current estimate of then expected amounts for the remediation work, assuming the work is performed in accordance with current laws and regulations and using a risk free rate of 3.74% and an inflation rate of 2%. It is reasonably possible that, due to uncertainties associated with the application of laws and regulations by regulatory authorities and changes in reclamation or remediation technology, the ultimate cost of reclamation and remediation could change in the future. We periodically review the accrued reclamation liability for information indicating that our assumptions should change.

The increases in the reclamation liability in 2015 and 2014 were related to the expansion of the heap leach facility and related infrastructure.

Changes to the asset retirement obligation were as follows:

Balance, Beginning of Year

22,991

Liabilities incurred

48,079

Disposal

Balance, End of Year

8. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities at December 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted of the following:

725,897

122,221

Accrued Salaries and Benefits

144,651

57,514

Advances Payable

258,041

Smelter Royalties Payable

13,154

Advances Payable - related parties

839,054

Accrued Interest Payable

3,741,948

Total Accrued Liabilities

5,612,234

9. Notes Payable

Pine Valley Investments –

On September 9, 2015, the Company issued an unsecured Short-Term Promissory Note (“Note”) to PineValley Investments in the principal amount of $250,000 (the “Note”) due on September 28, 2015 and bears a 10% interest rate. The Company made a payment of $275,000 for the principal and accrued interest balance of $25,000 on September 28, 2015. The note and accrued interest were paid in full. The Company recognized $25,000 in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2015.

On November 11, 2015, the Company issued an unsecured Short-Term Promissory Note (“Note”) to PineValley Investments in the principal amount of $35,000 (the “Note”) due on November 18, 2015 and bears a 10% interest rate. The Company made a payment of $35,350 for the principal and accrued interest balance of $350 on December 9, 2015. The note and accrued interest were paid in full. The Company recognized $350 in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2015.

On November 18, 2015, the Company issued an unsecured Short-Term Promissory Note (“Note”) to PineValley Investments in the principal amount of $170,000 (the “Note”) due on December 5, 2015 and bears a 10% interest rate. The Company made a payment of $187,000 for the principal and accrued interest balance of $17,000 on December 9, 2015. The note and accrued interest were paid in full. The Company recognized $17,000 in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2015.

On December 10, 2015, the Company issued an unsecured Short-Term Promissory Note (“Note”) to PineValley Investments in the principal amount of $170,000 (the “Note”) due on January 9, 2016 and bears a 10% interest rate. The Company made a payment of $100,000 towards the principal balance on December 22, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the outstanding balance of the note was $70,000.

10. Convertible Notes Payable

Convertible notes payable were comprised of the following as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

12/31/2014

Short-term Convertible Notes Payable

Dave Waverek convertible note payable

Iconic Holdings convertible note payable

55,000

JMJ Financial convertible note payable

Jonathan Shane convertible note payable

Typenex convertible note payable

58,000

UP and Burlington convertible note payable

Total Short-term Convertible Notes Payable

237,500

Phil Zobrist convertible note payable

297,500

Less unamortized discount

(181,292

Total Convertible Notes Payable, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount

116,208

Less: Current Portion

(114,553

(60,000

Total Long-term Convertible Notes Payable, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount

Dave Wavrek –

On June 7, 2014, the Company entered into an unsecured Note Purchase Agreement for the sale of a 20% convertible promissory note in which the Company will receive the principal amount of $100,000. The note bears interest at the rate of 20% per annum and all interest and principal must be repaid on December 31, 2015. The note is convertible, at the holder’s option into shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.45 per share. A beneficial conversion feature on the new note was recorded for $100,000. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $0 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $4,500 and accrued interest was $40,000. The note is currently in default.

Firstfire Global

– On June 23, 2015, the Company issued an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) to Firstfire Global in the principal amount of $115,000 (the “Note”) due on September 23, 2015 and bears 8% per annum interest, due at maturity. The total net proceeds the Company received was $94,000 (less an original issue discount (“OID”) of $21,000). The Note is convertible into common stock, at holder’s option, at a price of $0.10 or a 55% discount to the lowest bid prices of the common stock during the 10 trading day period prior to conversion. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the above described note. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features. On September 23, 2015 the Company negotiated an extension of the note to October 20, 2015. As part of the agreement, the Company made payments of $46,050 and issued 150,000 shares of common stock valued at $17,145. The Company recorded a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $26,102 due to the derivative valuation and the shares of common stock issued. On October 13, 2015, the Company made a payment of $25,000. On October 20, 2015, the Company negotiated another extension of the note to November 19, 2015. As part of the agreement, the Company made payments of $20,000 and issued 100,000 shares of common stock valued at $30,000. The Company recorded a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $30,581 due to the derivative valuation and the shares of common stock issued. The Company paid the outstanding balance of the note and accrued interest on November 19, 2015. The Company also had to pay a prepayment penalty of $28,750, which was recorded as interest expense. The total payments made were $55,529.

In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Company issued detachable warrants granting the holder the right to acquire an aggregate of 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.25 per share. The warrants expire on June 23, 2020. The warrants contain certain reset (anti-dilutive) provisions.

The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the above described note and detached warrants. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features and reset provisions. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date. At the inception of the Note, the Company determined the fair value of $310,952 and $50,000 of embedded derivatives related to the Note and warrants, respectively. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binominal Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 38.05% and 788.08% (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.00% and 1.76%, (4) expected life of 0.02 and 5.01 years, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock of $0.114 to $0.30 per share.

The determined fair value of the aggregate derivatives of $360,952 were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the note with the remainder $266,952 charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $0 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $0 and accrued interest was $0.

Iconic Holdings

– On November 17, 2015, the Company entered into an unsecured Note Purchase Agreement in which the Company will receive the principal amount of $55,000 with an original issue discount of 10% of loaned funds. The Company has received funds totaling $50,000 and recorded additional principal due to the original issue discount totaling $5,000. The note bears interest at the rate of 10% per annum and all interest and principal must be repaid on June 1, 2016. The note is convertible into common stock, at the holder’s option, at the lower of $0.15 or 60% of the lowest three trading prices of the Company’s common stock during the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the date of conversion. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the note. The embedded derivatives relate to conversion features.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date, which at December 31, 2015 was $175,516. At the inception of the notes, the Company determined the aggregate fair value of $222,296 of the embedded derivatives. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binomial Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 289.73% to 309.45%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.34% to 0.49%, (4) expected lives of 0.42 to 0.54 years, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock from $0.20 to $0.28 per share based upon quoted market price. The initial fair value of the embedded debt derivatives of $222,296 were allocated as a debt discount up to the proceeds of the notes ($55,000) with the remainder ($167,296) charged to current period operations as interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $12,284 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $55,000 and accrued interest was $663.

JMJ Financial Services

– On December 9, 2015, the Company issued an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) to JMJ Financial Services (“JMJ”), in the principal amount of $55,000 (the “Note”) due on December 9, 2017 and bears 12% per annum interest, due at maturity. The total net proceeds the Company received was $50,000 (less an original issue discount (“OID”) of $5,000). The Note is convertible into common stock, at holder’s option, at the lesser of $0.25 or a 40% discount of the lowest trading price of the common stock during the 25 trading day period prior to conversion. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the note. The embedded derivatives relate to conversion features.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date, which at December 31, 2015 was $188,474. At the inception of the notes, the Company determined the aggregate fair value of $138,644 of the embedded derivatives. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binomial Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 211.34% to 213.61%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.93% to 1.06%, (4) expected lives of 1.94 to 2.00 years, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock from $0.20 to $0.25 per share based upon quoted market price. The initial fair value of the embedded debt derivatives of $138,644 were allocated as a debt discount up to the proceeds of the notes ($55,000) with the remainder ($83,644) charged to current period operations as interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $1,505 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $55,000 and accrued interest was $403.

Jonathan Shane

– On June 15, 2015, the Company issued an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) to Jonathan Shane in the principal amount of $25,000 (the “Note”) due on June 14, 2016 and bears 12% per annum interest, due at maturity. The total net proceeds the Company received was $25,000. The Note is convertible into common stock, at holder’s option, at a price of $0.59 or a 40% discount to the average of the three lowest trading prices of the common stock during the 25 trading day period prior to conversion. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the above described note. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date. At the inception of the Note, the Company determined the fair value of $40,716 of embedded derivatives related to the Note. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binominal Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 188.8% to 298.31%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.28% to 0.49%, (4) expected life of 0.45 to 1.00 year, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock of $0.12 to $0.20 per share. The determined fair value of the aggregate derivatives of $40,716 were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the note with the remainder $15,716 charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense.

On July 7, 2015, the Company issued an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) to Jonathan Shane in the principal amount of $30,000 (the “Note”) due on July 6, 2016 and bears 12% per annum interest, due at maturity. The total net proceeds the Company received was $30,000. The Note is convertible into common stock, at holder’s option, at a price of $0.59 or a 40% discount to the average of the three lowest trading prices of the common stock during the 25 trading day period prior to conversion. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the above described note. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date. At the inception of the Note, the Company determined the fair value of $84,695 of embedded derivatives related to the Note. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binominal Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 201.56% to 290.58%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.25% to 0.49%, (4) expected life of 0.52 to 1.00 year, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock of $0.13 to $0.205 per share. The determined fair value of the aggregate derivatives of $84,695 were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the note with the remainder $54,695 charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $7,397 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $55,000 and accrued interest was $2,538.

Phil Zobrist

– On January 11, 2013, the Company issued an unsecured Promissory Note (“Note”) to Phil Zobrist in the principal amount of $60,000 (the “Note”) due on demand and bearing 0% per annum interest. The total net proceeds the Company received was $60,000. On October 2, 2015, the Company entered into a new convertible note with Phil Zobrist that matures on December 31, 2016 and bears 18% per annum interest. The Company agreed to accrue interest from inception of these Notes in the amount of $29,412 and charged this amount to interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2015. The Note is convertible into common stock, at holder’s option, at a price of $0.18 or a 50% discount to the average of the three lowest VWAP of the common stock during the 20 trading day period prior to conversion. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the above described note. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date. At the inception of the Note, the Company determined the fair value of $284,799 of embedded derivatives related to the Note. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binominal Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 214.29% to 261.78%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.25% to 0.65%, (4) expected life of 1.00 to 1.25 year, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock of $0.15 to $0.20 per share. The determined fair value of the aggregate derivatives of $284,799 were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the note with the remainder $224,799 charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $11,842 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $60,000 and accrued interest was $32,075.

Typenex

– On July 7, 2015, the Company issued an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) to Typenex Co-Investment LLC (“Typenex”), in the principal amount of $58,000 (the “Note”) due on February 7, 2016 and bears 10% per annum interest, due at maturity. The total net proceeds the Company received was $50,000 (less an original issue discount (“OID”) of $5,000 and legal fees reimbursement of $3,000). The Note is convertible into common stock, at holder’s option, at a 40% discount to the average of the three lowest bid prices of the common stock during the 20 trading day period prior to conversion. However, should the average of the three lowest bid prices as described above fall below $0.60, then the applicable discount increases to 45%. In addition, the conversion price is to subject to be reduced should the Company issue or grant common stock or equivalents (as defined) at a lower issuance price (dilutive issuance).

In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Company issued detachable warrants granting the holder the right to acquire an aggregate of 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.25 per share. The warrants expire on June 30, 2020. The warrants contain certain reset (anti-dilutive) provisions.

The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the above described note and detached warrants. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features and reset provisions. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date. At the inception of the Note, the Company determined the fair value of $123,304 and $51,250 of embedded derivatives related to the Note and warrants, respectively. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binominal Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 168.78% to 704.06% (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.06% and 1.55%, (4) expected life of 0.10 and 5.01 years, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock of $0.13 to $0.205 per share.

The determined fair value of the aggregate derivatives of $174,554 were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the note with the remainder $124,554 charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $24,279 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $58,000 and accrued interest was $2,978.

UP and Burlington Development

– On February 25, 2013, the Company, its majority shareholder, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Inception Development Inc. (the “Subsidiary”), entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Inception Resources, LLC, a Utah corporation, pursuant to which the Company purchased the U.P. and Burlington Gold Mine in consideration of 16,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $160 (valued at par value of $0.00001 because of the entities being under common control), the assumption of promissory notes in the amount of $800,000 and $150,000 and the assignment of a 3% net royalty. The Asset Purchase Agreement closed on February 25, 2013. On November 1, 2013, one of the notes was renegotiated with the note holder. The original note was restructured and treated as an extinguishment and as such is now convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.45 per share. All the other points of the note remained the same. A beneficial conversion feature on the new note was recorded for $630,000. On February 11, 2014, the Company converted $130,000 of principal into 288,889 shares of common stock. On December 10, 2014, the note holder elected to convert $41,250 of the principle balance of the note into 91,666 shares of common stock at $0.45 per share. On December 17, 2014, the note holder elected to convert $300,000 of the principle balance of the note into 666,666 shares of common stock at $0.45 per share. On December 17, 2014, the note holder elected to forgive $148,750 of the principle balance of the note. As of December 31, 2015, the outstanding balance on this note was $10,000.

11. Convertible Note Payable – Related Parties

Claymore Management convertible note payable

GAIA Ltd convertibe note payable

2,027,980

MDL Ventures convertible note payable

Total convertible notes payable, net of unamortized debt discount

Claymore Management

– On March 18, 2011, the Company issued an unsecured Promissory Note (“Note”) to Claymore Management in the principal amount of $185,000 (the “Note”) due on demand and bears 0% per annum interest. The total net proceeds the Company received was $185,000. On October 2, 2015, the Company entered into a new convertible note with Claymore Management that matures on December 31, 2016 and bears 18% per annum interest. The Company agreed to accrue interest from March 18, 2011 in the amount of $151,355 and charged this amount to interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2015. The Note is convertible into common stock, at holder’s option, at a price of $0.18 or a 50% discount to the average of the three lowest VWAP of the common stock during the 20 trading day period prior to conversion. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the above described note. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date. At the inception of the Note, the Company determined the fair value of $1,071,380 of embedded derivatives related to the Note. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binominal Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 214.29% (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.25%, (4) expected life of 1.25 year, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock of $0.15 per share. The determined fair value of the aggregate derivatives of $1,071,380 were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the note with the remainder $886,380 charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $36,513 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $185,000 and accrued interest was $159,566.

GAIA Ltd.

– Between December 2011 and October 2012, the Company issued seven unsecured Promissory Notes (“Notes”) to GAIA Ltd. for a total principal amount of $1,150,000 (the “Notes”) due on demand and bearing 0% per annum interest. The total net proceeds the Company received was $1,150,000. On October 2, 2015, the Company entered into a new convertible note with GAIA Ltd. that matures on December 31, 2016 and bears 18% per annum interest. The Company agreed to accrue interest from inception of these Notes in the amount of $724,463 and charged this amount to interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2015. The Note is convertible into common stock, at holder’s option, at a price of $0.18 or a 50% discount to the average of the three lowest VWAP of the common stock during the 20 trading day period prior to conversion. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the above described note. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date. At the inception of the Note, the Company determined the fair value of $5,970,658 of embedded derivatives related to the Note. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binominal Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 214.29% (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.25%, (4) expected life of 1.25 year, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock of $0.15 per share. The determined fair value of the aggregate derivatives of $5,970,658 were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the note with the remainder $4,820,658 charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $226,974 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $1,150,000 and accrued interest was $775,504.

Legends Capital Group

– Between October 2011 and September 2012, the Company issued eleven unsecured Promissory Notes (“Notes”) to Legends Capital Group for a total principal amount of $765,000 (the “Notes”) due on demand and bearing 0% per annum interest. The total net proceeds the Company received was $765,000. On October 2, 2015, the Company entered into a new convertible note with Legends Capital Group that matures on December 31, 2016 and bears 18% per annum interest. The Company agreed to accrue interest from inception of these Notes in the amount of $504,806 and charged this amount to interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2015. The Note is convertible into common stock, at holder’s option, at a price of $0.18 or a 50% discount to the average of the three lowest VWAP of the common stock during the 20 trading day period prior to conversion. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the above described note. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date. At the inception of the Note, the Company determined the fair value of $4,044,667 of embedded derivatives related to the Note. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binominal Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 214.29% to 261.78%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.25% to 0.65%, (4) expected life of 1.00 to 1.25 year, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock of $0.15 to $0.20 per share. The determined fair value of the aggregate derivatives of $4,044,667 were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the note with the remainder $3,279,667 charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $150,987 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $765,000 and accrued interest was $538,759.

LW Briggs Irrevocable Trust

– Between December 2010 and January 2013, the Company issued eight unsecured Promissory Notes (“Notes”) to LW Briggs Irrevocable Trust for a total principal amount of $1,101,000 (the “Notes”) due on demand and bearing 0% per annum interest. The total net proceeds the Company received was $1,101,000. On October 2, 2015, the Company entered into a new convertible note with LW Briggs Irrevocable Trust that matures on December 31, 2016 and bears 18% per annum interest. The Company agreed to accrue interest from inception of these Notes in the amount of $814,784 and charged this amount to interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2015. The Note is convertible into common stock, at holder’s option, at a price of $0.18 or a 50% discount to the average of the three lowest VWAP of the common stock during the 20 trading day period prior to conversion. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the above described note. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date. At the inception of the Note, the Company determined the fair value of $6,102,276 of embedded derivatives related to the Note. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binominal Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 214.29% to 261.78%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.25% to 0.65%, (4) expected life of 1.00 to 1.25 year, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock of $0.15 to $0.20 per share. The determined fair value of the aggregate derivatives of $6,102,276 were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the note with the remainder $5,001,276 charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $217,303 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $1,101,000 and accrued interest was $863,650.

– The Company entered into an unsecured convertible note payable agreement with MDL Ventures, LLC, which is 100% owned by a Company officer, effective October 1, 2014, due on December 31, 2016 and bears 18% per annum interest, due at maturity. Principal on the convertible note is convertible into common stock at the holder’s option at a price of the lower of $0.18 or 50% of the lowest three daily volume weighted average prices of the Company’s common stock during the 20 consecutive days prior to the date of conversion.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date. At the inception of the Note, the Company determined the fair value of $600,937 of embedded derivatives related to the Note. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binominal Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 121.06% to 265.70%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.00% to 0.14%, (4) expected life of 0.17 to 1.00 year, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock of $0.11 to $0.88 per share. The determined fair value of the aggregate derivatives of $600,937 were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the note with the remainder $242,521 charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $0 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $774,635 and accrued interest was $0.

Silverbrook Corporation

– Between March 2011 and February 2015, the Company issued 23 unsecured Promissory Notes (“Notes”) to Silverbrook Corporation for a total principal amount of $2,227,980 (the “Notes”) due on demand and bearing 0% per annum interest. The total net proceeds the Company received was $2,227,980. On October 2, 2015, the Company entered into a new convertible note with Silverbrook Corporation that matures on December 31, 2016 and bears 18% per annum interest. The Company agreed to accrue interest from inception of these Notes in the amount of $1,209,606 and charged this amount to interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2015. The Note is convertible into common stock, at holder’s option, at a price of $0.18 or a 50% discount to the average of the three lowest VWAP of the common stock during the 20 trading day period prior to conversion. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to the above described note. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Notes and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date. At the inception of the Note, the Company determined the fair value of $10,949,616 of embedded derivatives related to the Note. The fair value of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Binominal Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 214.29% to 261.78%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.25% to 0.65%, (4) expected life of 1.00 to 1.25 year, and (5) the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock of $0.15 to $0.20 per share. The determined fair value of the aggregate derivatives of $10,949,616 were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the note with the remainder $8,721,636 charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $439,733 of debt discount to current period operations as interest expense. As of December 31, 2015 the gross balance of the note was $2,227,980 and accrued interest was $1,308,492.

12. Stockholders’ Deficit

On October 2, 2015, the Company issued 14,757,683 shares of common stock in exchange for the issued and outstanding shares of Clavo Rico, Ltd. Clavo Rico, Ltd. Became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Under this merger agreement, there was a change in control and it has been treated for accounting purposes as a reverse recapitalization with Clavo Rico, Ltd. being the surviving entity.

On October 20, 2015, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for negotiation of a note extension. The Company recorded $30,000 ($0.30 per shares) as a loss on extinguishment of debt.

On October 20, 2015, a shareholder returned 150,000 shares of common stock to the Company for cancellation. There was no cost to the Company for these shares.

On December 15, 2015, a shareholder returned 83,333 shares of common stock to the Company for cancellation. There was no cost to the Company for these shares.

On December 17, 2015, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock for cash at $0.098 per share. The Company received cash proceeds of $49,000.

Warrants

The following tables summarize the warrant activity during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Stock Warrants

Number of Warrants

Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance at December 31, 2013

112,250

Granted

300,765

Exercised

Forfeited

Balance at December 31, 2014

413,015

600,000

Balance at December 31, 2015

1,013,015

2015 Outstanding Warrants

Warrants Exercisable

Range of

Number Outstanding at

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life

Number Exercisable at

$ 0.205 - 1.25

2.63 years

13. Net Loss Per Common Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options, warrants, and convertible securities to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the basic and diluted computation of net loss per share:

Numerator:

Loss available to Controlling Shareholders

Denominator:

Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

Effect of Dilutive Securities

Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

Net Loss per Common Share:

The following table includes the number of common stock equivalent shares that are not included in the computation of diluted loss per share, because the Company has a net loss and the inclusion of such shares would be antidilutive.

149,560,507

14. Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”). Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The provision for income tax expense (recovery) is comprised the following amounts:

Expected income tax (recovery) expense at the statutory rate of 34%

(9,236,217

(61,874

Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes (net of other amounts deductible for tax purposes)

Change in valuation allowance

9,236,031

Provision for income taxes

The components of deferred income tax in the accompanying balance sheets are as follows:

Deferred income tax asset:

Net operating loss carry-forwards

1,269,221

1,087,091

Section 195 Startup Costs

1,393,346

Debt Discount

(1,543,179

Derivative Liability

9,157,681

Mineral Property

46,053

Valuation allowance

(10,323,122

(1,087,091

Deferred income taxes

As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for U.S. federal income tax purposes of approximately $9,236,000 and $3,197,000 million, respectively. A portion of the federal amount, $1,710,000, is subject to an annual limitation of approximately $17,000 as a result of a change in the Company’s ownership through February 2013, as defined by Federal Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and the related income tax regulations. As a result of the 20-year federal carryforward period and the limitation, approximately, $1,400,000 of the net operating loss will expire unutilized. These net operating loss carry-forwards will expire through the year ending 2035.

The valuation allowance was established to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. This is necessary due to the Company’s continued operating losses and the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to utilize all of the net operating loss carry-forwards before they will expire through the year 2035.

The net change in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2015 was an approximate increase of $9,236,031.

The Company is subject to income tax in the U.S. federal jurisdiction. The Company has not been audited by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in connection with income taxes. The Company’s tax years beginning with the year ended June 30, 2010 through December 31, 2015 generally remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service until its net operating loss carryforwards are utilized and the applicable statutes of limitation have expired.

15. Related Party Transactions

Acquisition of Mining Rights –

On February 25, 2013, the Company, its majority shareholder, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Inception Development Inc. (the “Subsidiary”), entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Inception Resources, LLC, a Utah corporation, pursuant to which the Company purchased the U.P. and Burlington Gold Mine in consideration of 16,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $160 (valued at par value of $0.00001 because of the entities being under common control), the assumption of promissory notes in the amount of $800,000 and $150,000 and the assignment of a 3% net royalty (see Note 2). The Asset Purchase Agreement closed on February 25, 2013. As of December 31, 2015, the outstanding balances on these notes were $10,000 and $0, respectively. On November 1, 2013, one of the notes was renegotiated with the note holder. The original note was restructured and treated as an extinguishment and as such is now convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.45 per share. All the other points of the note remained the same. A beneficial conversion feature on the new note was recorded for $630,000. During the year ended December 31, 2014, $630,000 of the beneficial conversion feature was accreted as interest expense. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the note holders agreed to forgive $161,750 of these notes resulting in the Company recognizing a gain on forgiveness of debt in the amount of $161,750. As of July 31, 2015, the Company determined that it was too costly for the mine to produce gold effectively and the mining claim should be impaired. The Company recognized a loss on impairment of the mining claim for $950,160 for the year ended July 31, 2015.

Consulting Agreement

– In February 2014, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a stockholder/director. The Company agreed to pay $18,000 per month for twelve months. As of December 31, 2015, the Company owed $375,341 to the stockholder/director in accrued consulting fees.

Lease

– The Company leases office space from a related affiliate, MDL Ventures, LLC, which includes month to month terms. Rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 amounted to $1,588.

Employment Agreements

– On February 25, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Michael Ahlin pursuant to which he was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director of the Company. Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Ahlin will become eligible to receive an annual salary, bonus and stock option upon the Company achieving positive earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) in two consecutive quarters as reflected in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). On August 1, 2015, the Company amended the previously entered into employment agreement with Michael Ahlin pursuant to which the eligibility requirements of the Company achieving positive EBITDA in two consecutive quarters as reflected in its filings with the SEC were removed.

On February 25, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Whit Cluff pursuant to which he was appointed as the Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company. Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Cluff will become eligible to receive an annual salary, bonus and stock option upon the Company achieving positive EBITDA in two consecutive quarters as reflected in its filings with the SEC. Mr. Cluff resigned as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company on November 3, 2015.

16. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

The Company at times is subject to other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, as of December 31, 2015, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to such matters, if any, is not likely to have a material impact on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity. However, as the outcome of litigation and other claims is difficult to predict significant changes in the estimated exposures could exist.

17. Subsequent Events

On December 15, 2015, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with Brian Brewer through which he agreed to return up to 500,000 shares of common stock in the Company. Pursuant to the terms of that Settlement Agreement, 83,333 shares of the Company were returned to the Company for cancellation on January 15, 2016, 83,333 shares of the Company were returned to the Company for cancellation on February 17, 2016, 83,333 shares of the Company were returned to the Company for cancellation on March 15, 2015, and 83,333 shares of the Company were returned to the Company for cancellation on April 20, 2016.

On January 13, 2016, the Company issued a convertible promissory note in the amount of $27,577 to its legal counsel for previous services rendered. The note may be converted at 90% of the volume weighted average price of such common stock (representing a 10% discount) during the three trading days immediately preceding the conversion.

On January 25, 2016, the Company issued an unsecured Short-Term Promissory Note (“Note”) to 3-2-1 Partners LLC in the principal amount of $75,000 (the “Note”) due on February 6, 2016 and bears a 10% interest rate. The Company made a payment of $82,500 for the principal and accrued interest balance of $7,500 on January 27, 2016. The note and accrued interest were paid in full.

On February 1, 2016, the Company issued an unsecured Short-Term Promissory Note (“Note”) to 3-2-1 Partners LLC in the principal amount of $50,000 (the “Note”) due on February 16, 2016 and bears a 10% interest rate. The Company made a payment of $55,000 for the principal and accrued interest balance of $5,000 on February 10, 2016. The note and accrued interest were paid in full.

On March 7, 2016, the Company issued an unsecured Short-Term Promissory Note (“Note”) to 3-2-1 Partners LLC in the principal amount of $25,000 (the “Note”) due on March 18, 2016 and bears a 10% interest rate. The Company made a payment of $26,250 for the principal and accrued interest balance of $1,250 on March 15, 2016. The note and accrued interest were paid in full.

18. Restatement

The Company has restated the 2015 financial statements as originally presented in its 10K filed on May 3, 2016. The changes and explanation of such are as follows:

Consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015:

Convertible notes payable - related parties

Derivative liaibility

Total current liabilities

Total liabilities

Accumulated deficit

Total controlling interest

Total stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the year ended December 31, 2015:

Total other income (expense)

Loss from operations before income taxes

Net loss - controlling interest

Net loss per share - basic and diluted

Total comprehensive loss

Total comprehensive loss - controlling interest

The adjustments above reflect restatement due to revised valuations of derivative liabilities on convertible notes payable and associated debt discounts being recognized during the year, together with the change in the derivative liability and amortization of debt discounts during the year.

In addition to the restatement of the 2015 financial statements, the Company has restated the financial statements presented in the 10-Q for periods of March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016 because of the same revised valuations of derivative liabilities on convertible notes payable and associated debt discounts. The changes are as follows:

Condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2016:

151,330

(11,076

140,254

3,455,343

(29,914

3,425,429

7,017,470

17,960,574

24,978,044

16,959,543

17,919,584

34,879,127

17,058,772

34,978,356

(11,781,956

(17,919,584

(29,701,540

(13,506,097

(31,425,681

(13,514,034

(31,433,618

Condensed consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three month period ended March 31, 2016:

2,932,472

(976,456

1,956,016

(1,504,860

(17,360

(1,522,220

1,413,918

(993,816

420,102

1,645,761

651,945

Net income

Net income - controlling interest

1,645,548

651,732

Net income per share - basic and diluted

Total comprehensive income

1,523,304

529,488

Total comprehensive income - controlling interest

1,523,054

529,238

Condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2016:

128,561

(2,480

126,081

4,627,314

(20,016

4,607,298

3,681,112

6,822,875

10,503,987

14,097,050

6,800,379

20,897,429

14,201,006

21,001,385

(9,560,633

(6,800,379

(16,361,012

(10,717,032

(17,517,411

(10,724,695

(17,525,074

Condensed consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the six month period ended June 30, 2016:

6,268,831

10,161,242

16,430,073

(3,094,588

(35,855

(3,130,443

3,162,156

10,125,387

13,287,543

3,867,358

13,992,745

3,866,871

13,992,258

Net income per share - diluted

3,654,870

13,780,257

3,654,499

13,779,886

The above information was disclosed in a filing to the SEC. To see the filing, click here.

To receive a free e-mail notification whenever INCEPTION MINING INC. makes a similar move, sign up!

Other recent filings from the company include the following:

Other definitive information statements - June 10, 2020

Auto Refresh

Feedback